The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1237 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Liz Smith
Has it proved to be more complicated than you were expecting, given that you have had to shift things?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Liz Smith
The Scottish Government said that that information would be available by the end of September. Do you have any other date for when you hope to complete it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 3 October 2023
Liz Smith
In your opening remarks, you said that you want to see a strategic objective when it comes to tax policy and that you have tasked your special tax group with focusing on that. What components would make a successful strategic overview of the tax system?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
Minister, how long do you envisage the co-design process taking? How many more months will we be doing it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Minister, you have talked about co-design, which your predecessor, Kevin Stewart, was also very keen on when he attended the committee on 8 November last year. The principles of co-design sound sensible, but the trouble is that it is an on-going process, as you have reiterated this morning. Surely, if it is on-going, that makes it very difficult to forecast in detail what the costs will be at the end of the process.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
Do any of you think that there is any sign that there is slight movement, and that economically inactive people are starting to look for jobs, or is it just a very difficult landscape?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
It is difficult. I also want to ask about high streets, and perhaps Rachel Cook is best placed to answer this question. Obviously, it is of great concern to many of us who represent rural communities that high streets in our smaller towns are decimated. What else can we do to try to reverse that trend?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
That is important, but it is even more important for the costs that go along with those changes to instil confidence in people that the bill will be deliverable. That is the area that concerns the committee, and I suggest that there is still an awful lot of work to be done before the next financial memorandum comes back to the committee to give us a much better idea of the costs, given the divergence of opinion.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
That is the point for this committee. I absolutely understand why co-design could be beneficial—particularly from the point of view of getting the input of many who feel that the existing system is not satisfactory—and I understood it when Kevin Stewart spoke to us, too. My concern is that the process of engagement is still going on, and we know from our previous consideration that, although many on the front line of the service were concerned about the change, lots of others involved in the delivery of the service were also quite critical—in fact, very critical, in a few cases—of what the Scottish Government proposed.
My point is that it is a bit like putting the cart before the horse. If the co-design continues—for good reasons—should we not finish that process before we come back with the detail of the bill and, therefore, the forecast of the costs? Would that not be an easier way of doing it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2023
Liz Smith
Will you tell us what those themes are?