The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1162 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
You have heard the criticism that has been levied that different committees of the Parliament—with the notable exception of this one—tend not to scrutinise the budget in huge detail because of all the other work that they are doing. Consequently, as the convener said at the outset, there is sometimes difficulty in understanding where various budget lines are, particularly budget line 4—in other words, where the money is. However, if we had a finance bill, the Parliament would scrutinise the different stages in considerable detail, which might help with some of the issues to do with the lack of transparency.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
My personal view, which is not just a result of the inquiry that I have been involved with but from reading extensively about other inquiries, is that victims do not feel that there is sufficient accountability in public authorities. In other words, the reason for the demand for public inquiries is that people are dissatisfied with the lack of accountability of different public bodies. If that is the case, that is a major issue. Therefore, in order to ensure better accountability, should there be more Government input into ensuring that whistleblowing is effectively responded to, or should there be other structures in the Government that can hold bodies to account?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
My last question is a general one—I am not talking about any specific inquiry. Do you think that there has been an increasing temptation for the Government—any Government, not just those of a particular political colour—to accept a public inquiry because doing so gets it out of the responsibility of taking decisions that perhaps it should have been taking?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I want to deal with the facts about the current settlement. As I understand it, the Scottish Fiscal Commission—which we have great respect for across the Parliament, and particularly in this committee—sets out the facts of where we are when it comes to predictions, as well as what the current situation is. It is not allowed to advise on policy—that is entirely in the hands of Government. Cabinet secretary, when it comes to addressing concerns arising from the Fiscal Commission’s statistics, whose advice do you take?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
That is correct.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Before I ask my questions, I put on the public record that I am very heavily involved in providing case notes to one of the inquiries—on a non-pecuniary basis, obviously—which might be used in evidence as that inquiry progresses.
Professor Cameron, when it comes to the decision whether an inquiry is judge led or not, to what extent is the main deciding issue about compelling witnesses to appear? That has been a concern for many of the victims who have been involved; they are very keen indeed—rightly so, in my opinion—to see specific witnesses compelled to give evidence.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
A finance bill would allow us to scrutinise the Scottish Government’s tax and spending proposals. It would allow the Parliament as a whole and not just committees to scrutinise the decisions that have been made in that regard. In addition, I would have thought that it would enable the Parliament to make greater use of the data that has been presented to it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Liz Smith
I am sure that they will also have more anxiety.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Liz Smith
Are those particularly difficult to measure? The issue of mental health claims is obviously very sensitive and covers quite a lot of psychological illnesses, for example, as well as mental illness. Is that difficult to capture?
Another question that the committee has been wrestling with for a long time is how we can balance the need for benefits of those who are genuinely in need against the desire to get more people back into work. Governments all over the world are struggling with that, particularly post-Covid. How easy is it to measure how many people could go into the workforce if they were well supported, particularly when it comes to things such as adult disability?