The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1162 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Liz Smith
Whether we are talking about south or north of the border, to ensure that social security is effective, in the context of the whole system, we have to be compassionate and understanding about those who are genuinely in need, and that approach has been the overall intention of the Scottish Government. The problem is that, if you become more compassionate, less adversarial and less intrusive, as the Scottish Legal Aid board was arguing, you might miss out on some essential information that the individual might not give you for whatever reason. That is quite a substantial problem, because these are the most vulnerable people whom we are trying to support. If they do not provide the information because it is not being asked for, there is a difficulty.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Liz Smith
Again, it was a point that came up from the Scottish Legal Aid Board’s evidence. The whole basis for that approach is to make things as easy as possible and ensure that those who are most in need get the support and benefits that they require. At the moment, there seems to be a grey area—let us call it that—as to how we go about that. That has come right through the evidence that we have taken, and it is about ensuring not just that the Scottish Government is aware of all that but that, through its various agencies, it can address some of those concerns. The big conundrum is that compassion is all very well, but, if that approach does not drill down on the information that we need, we will not get very far.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Do people demand judge-led public inquiries, because they believe that that person will have the legal authority and standing to get more out of the evidence?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
In answer to Mr Mason, you implied that the demand for public inquiries was growing. Is one of the reasons for that increase the fact that public services in the UK, not just in Scotland, are not delivering satisfactory answers when something goes wrong?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Indeed—I really think that that is quite a serious issue, and it is one of the reasons for the increasing demand for specific public inquiries. Actually, I think that it is also a reason why inquiries are taking longer—the to-ing and fro-ing that is needed to get the information required takes an awfully long time, and the costs multiply. It is partly the hidden costs that result in the process taking such a long time; redaction, for example, is vital for data confidentiality and so on.
However, there is a real issue with the amount of time that the process itself takes. There is frustration with that, because some of the answers should have been provided before by some of the agencies that have been accused of a lack of accountability and of not taking responsibility. That is a major issue. Do you have any thoughts about what we can do to improve that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I have just a very short question. Do you think that the Parliament needs to look at the Inquiries Act 2005?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
How does the advisory group on tax strategy input into that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I understand that. That is interesting because, if the group is providing advice about behavioural changes, surely that is extremely important for any decision that the Government comes to in relation to a strategy that will provide you with extra revenue and enable you to control public finances. How easy is it for you, as the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, to be able to take on board the facts that the Fiscal Commission has given you and also the advice—and it is advice—that your tax group is providing? That advice includes behavioural change. The Fiscal Commission says that behaviour is crucial for the amount of revenue that you are likely to bring in, not just now but in years hence.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Liz Smith
I understand that; they probably could not be reconciled at all. Nevertheless, you have to make a decision, in setting your policy, as to which views you consider most important, and that has to correlate—I would hope—with the information that the Scottish Fiscal Commission and the other economic forecasters have provided. It is on that aspect that there are some issues to do with a lack of transparency.
I know that it would be for the Parliament to decide on this, but does the Scottish Government have a view on the possibility of introducing a finance bill in this parliamentary session? Such a bill could be important as it would not only put the Government’s tax-and-spend priorities on a legal basis but enable the Parliament to scrutinise that in the usual way during the passage of the bill. Is the Government open to doing that?