The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1341 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
I have a question on the theme of data. You rightly say that data is extremely important when it comes to the work that you do.
We have had many discussions with the Scottish Fiscal Commission and think tanks about the relevant data from the labour force survey, which has been flagged up to us as not being particularly accurate. Labour market trends are crucial in relation to tax revenue. Does that problem affect you in any particular way? Are you aware of concerns about the lack of accurate data on labour market trends?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Is there good co-operation with other public bodies that are trying to access that data?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
I have just one question, minister. Notwithstanding the fact that nobody likes paying extra tax, whether it be a new tax or an old one, are you in any way concerned about the level of criticism about this tax by stakeholders?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
I know that you cannot comment on tax policy decisions but, in light of the information that we have received from a number of stakeholders, are you concerned about the level of criticism of the potential unintended consequences of the tax? Has that formed any part of your discussions with the Scottish Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Finally, are the issues that the Scottish Government is talking to you about regarding this tax more concerning than the issues that it is talking to you about regarding other taxes? Do you feel that the Scottish Government thinks that there are more concerns about the potential problems with this tax than other tax policies?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
I think that this is a very important issue for the committee. There have been substantial concerns about potential—perhaps unintended—consequences, and it would be good to have your assurance on the record that the Scottish Government is listening to those concerns and is prepared to make some amendments.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Are you aware of the potential impact, and has the Scottish Government discussed that with you?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Liz Smith
Does the level of criticism—particularly that the committee has heard from stakeholders—concern you at all? Is that a warning signal that the tax could have unintended consequences? Quite frequently, during committee evidence and through the submissions that we have received, it has been put to us that there are quite a lot of possible unintended consequences. There is the issue that Mr Marra referred to, which is that some people who could end up paying the tax would not be responsible for the problem. If we go back to what you started with, surely, the principles of Adam Smith are very important for the delivery of the tax. Irrespective of the fact that you cannot comment on the specific policy issue, are you concerned that people are unhappy about some of it?