Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1405 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Liz Smith

Will that continue? In the autumn, when the Parliament in the new session is embedded, there will be more training on the budget. Will that be extended to parliamentary staff as well as to new MSPs?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Liz Smith

But given that there is concern—which this committee has expressed not just this year but for several years now—that it is absolutely critical to have transparency in times of difficult circumstances, is it not something that the Government would choose to provide more detail on than we currently have?

The Scottish Fiscal Commission made the point that, if you compare the current Scottish spending review to what was produced in the 2011 spending review, we are not getting nearly enough of the budget line 3 spending requirements. It is therefore very difficult for us, as a committee that is supposed to be scrutinising the finances of the country, to know exactly where the most productive policy engagement is and where the Government would be perfectly in order to deprioritise, because the outcome is not so good. Is that not fundamental to the process of budget making?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Liz Smith

Never mind the measures in the budget; overall, considerable concern has been expressed about how the Scottish Government delivered it, and there has also been the analysis of our experts.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

I have a question about the prioritisation or—perhaps just as important—the deprioritisation of Scottish Government spend. It relates to paragraph 54 in the committee’s report, in which we said that we sought clarity

“on which areas of spending are being prioritised and deprioritised.”

That was on the back of comments from Audit Scotland, which was also looking for a bit more clarity on that.

Obviously, we have our bigger ambitions about tackling climate change, child poverty and economic development. However, it is very hard to see in the budget exactly which policies will deliver improvement in those areas. Do you agree with that concern and, if so, what extra information would you like from the Scottish Government?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

Except that the committee has asked for it.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

I think you were in the room when I asked the previous panel about social security. Those questions were about the committee’s concerns that we are not getting sufficient detail about the rate at which social security spend is increasing as result of specific policies, and that we need much better information about the effectiveness of that spend. Does that also concern you?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

The challenge for this committee in examining social security spend is knowing which policies are making the biggest difference to the Scottish Government’s broad aims and which are less important in that sense. We all want to achieve better outcomes in social security delivery, but it is difficult to understand that because we do not have the relevant data.

That begs a question, which the committee raised in its report, about universal payments. If you run the argument that we are spending too much on social security, because we are not getting enough money in through revenue payments, there is a strong argument for examining universalism and what is and is not effective.

I do not want you to comment on Government policy—and I know that you will not do that—but is it your understanding that that debate is hampered because we do not have some of that detail?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

Thank you—that was very helpful.

At paragraph 62 of its report, the committee goes on to say that we are

“not convinced that the Scottish Government has set out sufficient evidence to support its argument that the future social security budget is sustainable.”

That leads on to something slightly different, but it is on the same theme, because, in effect, it says that we do not have enough information available to provide the evidence that the social security budget—which, as we know, is increasing quite fast—will be sustainable. It is all part of the same thing: there is not enough detail. Is that a fair comment?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

Can you give some examples of data that is not there that would be helpful?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 20 January 2026

Liz Smith

When will that RAPID system come on stream?