The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1446 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
I understand what the cabinet secretary has said, and it is, of course, for the Government to set out its priorities, even though we might disagree with them. However—and this is the wider point that is being made to us by the economic analysts—the Scottish Government has four mantras, which include tackling child poverty and ensuring economic growth, but we do not feel that there is enough detail behind specific policy priorities to convince us that a particular choice of outcome represents a better spend of public money than any other choice. The opportunity cost of that, obviously, is that some priorities are deprioritised, and it is that piece of economic analysis that I think people want to see.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
I have a question that relates to an answer that you gave to the convener. You said that, when a decision relates to the private sector, you cannot automatically assume what the decision will be. Will you update us on the discussions that are taking place in the Government—you have referred to those discussions in the chamber, and the Deputy First Minister has referred to them a lot—about collaboration between the private and public sectors, particularly on infrastructure investment? What stage are you at with those discussions, given the fiscal constraints that exist on infrastructure development?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
I am very interested in what you have said about that. I assume that you would prefer the committee that takes on that role to have finance and public administration within it, rather than having separate committees. What should happen in the Parliament is that all committees hold the Government to account on everything, but you are quite right that people tend to look in their silos and do not always see that broader picture. Is it your recommendation that the next Parliament should have a finance and public administration committee? Am I right to say that you are not trying to separate those remits?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
You mentioned that this committee has taken on quite a large role when it comes to the scrutiny of public administration, particularly of things such as public sector reform. If the next Parliament were to have a committee with the same remit—finance and public administration—would you like to see anything else in that scrutiny role in relation to public administration?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Sorry, convener. Of course, it is co-design.
That has been a problem for this committee. In about five or six cases that I can think of, there has been a huge issue with the financial memorandum accompanying a bill because it has not been accurate. Craig Hoy mentioned the social care policy, and it was a huge issue there.
The second problem is that it is very difficult to scrutinise effectively if some of the co-design does not happen until after the parliamentary process. Do you think that that is a major problem, and what do you think we should do about it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Hear, hear.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
I completely agree with my colleague’s comments. Aside from the party politics, I think that there is a wider issue here that relates to the budget scrutiny that we have undertaken. Obviously, the Government makes its choices, as it is entirely entitled to do, and sets out its priorities, but the question is what has been deprioritised. We, as a committee, do not feel that we are getting sufficient information about the reasons for certain priorities being chosen and the evidence supporting such decisions, but, more important, about those areas where there is deprioritisation.
I ask the cabinet secretary to be mindful of that. As we said in the debate in Parliament last week, those points are being put to us by our senior analysts in Scotland, and I would be grateful for her reflections on them.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Thank you—that is helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Liz Smith
Quite right.