The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Liz Smith
:That is exactly my point. We need to find more detail on that to ensure that we are spending money in the best way possible.
My other reflection is that the next Parliament will face several seriously big challenges and that one of those is to make a decision on universal payments. There is a lot of commentary at the moment about what universal payments deliver and how well they deliver it. Will it be easier in the post-election period—as opposed to now, during the pre-election period—to get cross-party evidence, or additional evidence from outside, to help us understand the universal issue? There is an argument that we cannot possibly afford all the universal payments that we have just now without considerable implications for the rest of the budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Liz Smith
:Before I come to my main question, Mr Hughes, I want to ask you about something that you said about the college sector, when you were replying to the convener. You made the very interesting comment that there is a vast pool of considerable talent and that the sector is doing a really good job of trying to harness that talent. I entirely agree with that.
You also mentioned, however, that you did not feel that the responses, in different regions, to the demand for the skills that are required were as good as they used to be. I would certainly agree with that, too. When I came into the Parliament 20 years ago, the local colleges were extremely good at picking up the local demand in a very small local community. Why do you think that they are not as good as they should be in picking up local demand?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Liz Smith
:That is helpful.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Liz Smith
:Thank you, both, for those helpful, if quite worrying, comments.
My other question relates to a comment made last summer by the Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes. She said—rightly so, in my opinion—that to have really good-quality infrastructure development in Scotland in future, we needed very good collaboration between the public and private sectors and that they needed to work together. The implication, I think, was that they are perhaps not working together as well as they should be. Can you outline the challenges with regard to that collaboration? Are there things that we should be doing to improve it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
I am generally happy with the instruments, minister. I have just one question. The policy note intimates that the instrument will not have much impact on local government, but four Scottish local authorities have their own quarries so they are taxed in a separate way. At the time, did any of the local government officers express any concern about this?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
:Off the back of the question that Mr Mason asked Mirren Kelly and Jack Gillespie, I would like to explore the IJB issue. Mr Mason pointed out that IJBs are, effectively, third bodies that are involved in the decision-making process—you have local government, the health board and the IJB. Certainly in my part of the country, there has been a lot of criticism of IJBs. Is the IJB structure the most effective way to deliver services, or should we look at doing something else?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
:Go on. That is why I asked the question.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
:Given that local government has been deprioritised—as Mirren Kelly rightly set out—to what extent have discussions taken place inside COSLA about the opportunity costs, given the extensive demands that you have mentioned for health and social care? You will have to make cuts.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
:Is there better accountability for decision making with IJBs than there was before they were set up?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Liz Smith
:Is that a leadership thing?