The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1405 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
Will that continue? In the autumn, when the Parliament in the new session is embedded, there will be more training on the budget. Will that be extended to parliamentary staff as well as to new MSPs?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
But given that there is concern—which this committee has expressed not just this year but for several years now—that it is absolutely critical to have transparency in times of difficult circumstances, is it not something that the Government would choose to provide more detail on than we currently have?
The Scottish Fiscal Commission made the point that, if you compare the current Scottish spending review to what was produced in the 2011 spending review, we are not getting nearly enough of the budget line 3 spending requirements. It is therefore very difficult for us, as a committee that is supposed to be scrutinising the finances of the country, to know exactly where the most productive policy engagement is and where the Government would be perfectly in order to deprioritise, because the outcome is not so good. Is that not fundamental to the process of budget making?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Liz Smith
Never mind the measures in the budget; overall, considerable concern has been expressed about how the Scottish Government delivered it, and there has also been the analysis of our experts.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
I have a question about the prioritisation or—perhaps just as important—the deprioritisation of Scottish Government spend. It relates to paragraph 54 in the committee’s report, in which we said that we sought clarity
“on which areas of spending are being prioritised and deprioritised.”
That was on the back of comments from Audit Scotland, which was also looking for a bit more clarity on that.
Obviously, we have our bigger ambitions about tackling climate change, child poverty and economic development. However, it is very hard to see in the budget exactly which policies will deliver improvement in those areas. Do you agree with that concern and, if so, what extra information would you like from the Scottish Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
Except that the committee has asked for it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
I think you were in the room when I asked the previous panel about social security. Those questions were about the committee’s concerns that we are not getting sufficient detail about the rate at which social security spend is increasing as result of specific policies, and that we need much better information about the effectiveness of that spend. Does that also concern you?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
The challenge for this committee in examining social security spend is knowing which policies are making the biggest difference to the Scottish Government’s broad aims and which are less important in that sense. We all want to achieve better outcomes in social security delivery, but it is difficult to understand that because we do not have the relevant data.
That begs a question, which the committee raised in its report, about universal payments. If you run the argument that we are spending too much on social security, because we are not getting enough money in through revenue payments, there is a strong argument for examining universalism and what is and is not effective.
I do not want you to comment on Government policy—and I know that you will not do that—but is it your understanding that that debate is hampered because we do not have some of that detail?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
Thank you—that was very helpful.
At paragraph 62 of its report, the committee goes on to say that we are
“not convinced that the Scottish Government has set out sufficient evidence to support its argument that the future social security budget is sustainable.”
That leads on to something slightly different, but it is on the same theme, because, in effect, it says that we do not have enough information available to provide the evidence that the social security budget—which, as we know, is increasing quite fast—will be sustainable. It is all part of the same thing: there is not enough detail. Is that a fair comment?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
Can you give some examples of data that is not there that would be helpful?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Liz Smith
When will that RAPID system come on stream?