Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1189 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

The “Scottish Government Guide to the Autumn Budget Revision” makes it clear that there is no change in the overall funding situation—that is fine. However, somebody in Perth or Dunfermline might want to know when the reprofiling will happen. Are you able to give us any guidance on that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

Right. I do not think that I have seen that information, and nor have some of my colleagues. If you could provide it, that would be very helpful.

Am I right in thinking that the separate £6 million that the guide highlights relates to very specific projects within some of the deals? Is that correct? I am looking at paragraph 59 of the Scottish Government’s guide, which says that there are

“Separately £6 million of project specific City Deal transfers”.

I presume that, if we take away the £6 million from the £43.7 million, we get the £37.7 million. Is that correct?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

I am not questioning the figures at all. With regard to the actual reprofiling, however, it would be helpful if we could get some detail, because there is inevitably a suspicion that some of that money is being lost. It is clear in the Scottish Government’s guide that it is not being lost, but if it is coming back in to be reprofiled, it would be helpful to get some idea of the timescale. I appreciate that you have to speak to UK colleagues in order to do that, but would it be possible? It would be helpful to know the timescale.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

Okay. Thank you for that.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

Yes, I understand that. I have no problem with the accounting, as I said—that is not the issue. The issue is that many people in various regions have concerns about their own specific projects and would like to know what the numbers are—not least for planning purposes, especially if there is infrastructure involved, for which it takes a long time to procure some resources. It would be helpful if we could get some more information on that reprofiling.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

I come back to the question about Whitehall transfers and that specific detail on the city deal. You have made it clear—indeed, you confirmed it for the convener—that a £43.74 million reduction will be reprofiled into future years with no loss of funding. What commitment have you had from the UK Government on the timescale for that reprofiling?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2025

Liz Smith

Thank you.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Liz Smith

The committee asked for an options paper because making such interventions is a very expensive business and, given the state of the public finances at the moment, we cannot afford to do everything that we would like to do, so big choices must be made. The Scottish Government will argue that the choices on its social contract with the people of Scotland are its number 1 priority. However, that social contract can come about only if we have the money coming in to deliver it.

I would argue strongly—as, I think, would the committee—that the public finances are under considerable strain. Therefore, if choices must be made, surely we need an options paper to show where you think the outcomes will be most effective. That is why the committee asked for that.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Liz Smith

I do not think that that explains the difference between the DWP and Social Security Scotland.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 18 February 2025

Liz Smith

I do not doubt that ministers have had discussions on the matter. Our job as the Finance and Public Administration Committee is to look at the effective spend of our public finances and to ensure that the evidence is there to support the choices that are made. My colleague Michael Marra asked for a specific options paper that we could scrutinise to look at what you call investments when it comes to various policies. A good investment will have good results. Therefore, if there are various options that involve different kinds of investment, you will want to weigh up the balance of the effective outcomes, particularly when it comes to action on child poverty, which is the Scottish Government’s number 1 priority. I do not think that we have had that information.