Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1911 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

It is unbelievable that nobody thought to question that expenditure. Now you would, but nobody at the time thought to question it.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

What was the answer, Mr McGill?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

Who were the other two?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

Are the other two people still with the organisation?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

Nice work if you can get it. Thank you, convener.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “NHS in Scotland 2023”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

That is very interesting. Does it come back to the committee’s recurring theme about the lack of data?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

You could have challenged it. You could have pushed back and said that the decision was inappropriate and cost far too much money. Part of the approach, which was revealed in another email to you, was that the chief operating officer who went to Harvard identified Harvard as her preferred option. She got to pick where she went. That is part of the approach that you have just said is okay, but it is not okay, is it?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

Mr Rathjen, you accept that you should have pushed back. You should have said, “This was unacceptable,” but you did not. That is fine: you admit that there was an error. To me, that is part of the culture that existed at the time: nobody was saying, “This is wrong.” Do you accept that point?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

“A few people”? How many?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Graham Simpson

Two or three people.