Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 13 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2770 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Graham Simpson

What figure would require ministerial direction?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Graham Simpson

What would you have to spend to get that due diligence done?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Graham Simpson

This is just the latest increase. Is there a top line above which you will not go to finish off the vessel?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Scottish Government Strategic Commercial Assets Division

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay. I will ask about the yard in general, then. We know that there is no confirmed work beyond the Glen Rosa—or, at least, none that I am aware of. I might be wrong—do you have other information? If not, it seems that once the Glen Rosa is finished, that is it—there is no more work.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

Very good.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

I am not planning to move amendment 444, given the cabinet secretary’s positive comments about working ahead of stage 3. Emma Roddick will have heard what I think should happen—which is that a group of MSPs should get together to explore those issues. Would she be interested in taking part in that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

That is good. I am encouraged to hear that.

Finally, my amendment 446 would just apply the affirmative procedure to the regulations that are proposed in amendment 444.

I shall leave it there, because I, too, have spoken at some length. I feel very strongly about this area, but I can see from looking around that everybody feels strongly about it, so I will end my remarks there.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

Going back to an earlier point, the cabinet secretary’s argument is that we already have existing laws to tackle the issue in the private sector, but those are not being used, which means that there is an issue. If she accepts that there is an issue, we need to do something about it. This is an opportunity to do something about it: to send a message in law—in legislation, which is what we are here to do—that such behaviour is unacceptable and that we will deal with it.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

Yes, I do, and I would be interested to hear what those other hazards are—I do not know, but they will be listed somewhere. My focus is on the damp and mould issues, which, as I said, the committee looked at on 18 March. We heard then from Sean Clerkin from the Scottish Tenants Organisation, who called for “proper statutory intervention” that would require accurate information about housing stock, annual inspections and training, so that all employees of private and social landlords can identify damp and mould. He said:

“For too long, the housing sector has lacked the knowledge and has been totally inadequate in dealing effectively with damp and mould.”—[Official Report, Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, 18 March 2025; c 9.]

That was a good point. Statutory intervention is required to help to protect tenants against the problems of damp and mould.

I think that it was you, convener, who said earlier that most of us will have had to deal with such problems at some point in our parliamentary careers, or if we have been councillors, as I was previously. When you said that, I reflected on an experience early in my time as an MSP when I had to deal with a case in Motherwell and saw the worst conditions that I have ever seen, in a block of flats that was riddled with damp and mould. The walls were absolutely black, but nothing was being done and those flats were not fit for habitation, but people were living there. The law was not adequate then and it is not adequate now, so we must do something about it, because people should not be living in those conditions in modern Scotland.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Graham Simpson

I have been listening very carefully, as I always do, to the arguments that have been put forward by Emma Roddick and Maggie Chapman. Emma Roddick suggests increasing from 21 days to 42 days the period during which a tenant can appeal a rent increase. The cabinet secretary is suggesting increasing the period from 21 days to 30 days. If, for example, someone were on holiday for two or three weeks, that would eat up the 21 days and not give them much time to do anything, even in the proposed 30-day period. Will the cabinet secretary reflect on that ahead of stage 3 and accept what other members are attempting to achieve?