The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2215 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
I was minded not to move amendment 23, but, having heard the comments so far, I think that I will when we get to it. I was not going to press it because I thought that there was some overlap with Mr Golden’s amendment 48, which would require ministers to take additional measures if they are off track in meeting a carbon budget, similar to Douglas Lumsden’s amendments 38, 39 and 40. However, having heard Mr Ruskell speak, I am minded to move my amendment 23, which is about monitoring and evaluation. If there is an issue with it, that could be dealt with at stage 3.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
That is a useful intervention. I do not like woolly wording, as Mr Ruskell knows. I definitely do not like loose wording in legislation, and there is a risk that the suggested wording could be seen as being that. However, in the spirit of compromise with which I have approached the process thus far, I have accepted that, at that stage, it will not be possible for the Government to set out in definitive terms the proposals and policies that will be in the next climate change plan, given that they need to be finalised once the carbon budgets are set.
I note that, during the stage 1 debate, Ms Martin made the point that it would not be advisable to publish, in her words, a “draft of a draft” of the climate change plan. Amendment 53 represents a balance between ensuring the availability of the information that the Parliament needs to conduct scrutiny and the Scottish Government’s need to finalise the policies to meet carbon budgets once they have been set.
If the committee is minded to support amendment 53, I invite it to take the view that Mark Ruskell’s amendments 6 and 7 are not required.
Finally, amendment 9 seeks to align carbon budgets with those of the rest of the UK for the reasons that I have set out. I will wait to hear from Ms Lennon. Mr Whittle is not with us, but I understand that Mr Lumsden is speaking for him today, so I will also wait to hear his contributions.
I move amendment 1.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
Thank you very much, convener. It has been a very full and interesting discussion so far.
Minister, the key question, which has been raised already, is basically what will happen if the regulation is annulled today. From what I have heard, given the timescale and where SPT is at, at the moment, it seems that there is time to introduce fairly minor primary legislation to change the system while SPT carries on with its consideration of franchising. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
No, that is okay. There does not have to be a panel.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
I will not, but I understand the amendment. Mr Lumsden will speak to it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
Absolutely.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
Amendment 45 would require the Scottish ministers to lay draft regulations to set carbon budgets within three months of receiving advice on Scottish carbon budget levels from the CCC. The amendment speaks to a recommendation in the committee’s stage 1 report, in which the committee highlighted the need
“to specify a maximum”
amount of time that could
“elapse between receipt of the advice”
from the relevant body
“and the laying of draft regulations to set”
the first carbon
“budgets.”
This is another amendment on which I have worked with the Government. I originally said that the maximum time should be two months, but we settled on three months. I do not think that that four-week difference is worth quibbling about. I am happy with the amendment and the compromise, and I ask the committee to support it.
In relation to Mark Ruskell’s amendments 5 and 59, I am fully supportive of any extra scrutiny that the use of the super-affirmative procedure would provide. That is important, so I urge the committee to support amendments 5 and 59.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
I want to clarify the last provision in the amendment, which says:
“Ministers must take steps to ensure that the document laid ... has been independently reviewed by a person with appropriate financial expertise.”
Is it Patrick Harvie’s intention that that should be just one individual, or does he mean that it should be a body? If it is a person—an individual—how would we assess what is meant by “appropriate financial expertise”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
Amendment 21 will require that the climate change plan’s costs and benefits assessment is
“broken down by reference to the period covered by a Scottish carbon budget in which those costs and benefits are expected to arise”.
The Scottish Government’s best practice approach already achieves the sentiment of amendment 21, but it has not been codified and it is not a requirement for future Governments. We appreciate the technical challenges in meeting the duty in an efficient way as, for example, some policies may straddle two carbon budget periods, but we think that it is possible to disaggregate that between carbon budget periods.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Graham Simpson
Given what we have heard already, whatever happens, it will be at least 2026 before anything happens, so there is time to do that.