The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2770 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay.
Mr Brannen, you said that you found a couple of the recommendations to be challenging from the point of view of timing. Which ones were you referring to?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
That all comes back to what we have been discussing, does it not, Mr Brannen? We have discussed with COSLA already today the issue of funding. For big schemes, small councils—or even large councils—could not possibly afford £600 million if that is the end result. It is a scheme of national significance. It is really important that the Government works with councils to decide how a scheme of that scale should be funded.
I know where we are. There is a local inquiry, and I know about the task force. However, at the end of the day we need to agree on who is going to pay for it, do we not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I refer you to paragraph 65 of the Auditor General’s report, bits of which were quite extraordinary. First, it says:
“There are significant gaps in data in relation to the annual allocation of money to councils for flooding by the Scottish Government”.
It goes on to say:
“The Scottish Government does not publish annual allocations to individual councils for major flood schemes or general flooding activity. The funding is provided via the General Capital Grant, therefore the Scottish Government does not monitor how annual allocations are spent by councils.”
Why on earth not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Perhaps that is a question for COSLA, then.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
What about the sentence on stakeholders saying that there is a risk that funds for flooding may have been redirected to other things? Is that actually going on?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
So the statement in the report could be true.
I have a question for SEPA—that is you, Ms Paterson. Are you aware of any building projects that have been blocked because of a SEPA objection on the basis of the risk of flooding?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Such schemes are often not within the curtilage of one landowner—they might cover an estate—so paragraph 32 is saying that the legislation is not clear on who is responsible for maintaining them. Do you accept that point?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to quote a couple of other things from the report. First—this relates to an earlier question from the convener—paragraph 32 says:
“Not all critical responsibilities for managing flood risk are covered by legislation. For example, the Act does not set out who is responsible for the maintenance of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems and for managing erosion enhanced flooding (Exhibit 2). This could mean important areas of activity may be missed.”
Do any of you know who is responsible? Mr Flucker, I am looking at you and you are looking at me, so perhaps you can answer.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Graham Simpson
On that point, you are saying that this was a one-off. The year that we are discussing is the only year for which there has been no budget.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Paragraph 16 on page 7 of the report says:
“UHI Perth’s appointed auditor”—
who I assume is Nicola Wright—
“informed the board that the preparation and monitoring of a budget is a crucial element of monitoring the financial position of the college. The auditor recommended that the college produce and monitor a budget each financial year.”
That is just a statement of the obvious. At what point did you have that discussion, and what was the response?