Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 12 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2770 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay.

Mr Brannen, you said that you found a couple of the recommendations to be challenging from the point of view of timing. Which ones were you referring to?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

That all comes back to what we have been discussing, does it not, Mr Brannen? We have discussed with COSLA already today the issue of funding. For big schemes, small councils—or even large councils—could not possibly afford £600 million if that is the end result. It is a scheme of national significance. It is really important that the Government works with councils to decide how a scheme of that scale should be funded.

I know where we are. There is a local inquiry, and I know about the task force. However, at the end of the day we need to agree on who is going to pay for it, do we not?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

I refer you to paragraph 65 of the Auditor General’s report, bits of which were quite extraordinary. First, it says:

“There are significant gaps in data in relation to the annual allocation of money to councils for flooding by the Scottish Government”.

It goes on to say:

“The Scottish Government does not publish annual allocations to individual councils for major flood schemes or general flooding activity. The funding is provided via the General Capital Grant, therefore the Scottish Government does not monitor how annual allocations are spent by councils.”

Why on earth not?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

Perhaps that is a question for COSLA, then.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

What about the sentence on stakeholders saying that there is a risk that funds for flooding may have been redirected to other things? Is that actually going on?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

So the statement in the report could be true.

I have a question for SEPA—that is you, Ms Paterson. Are you aware of any building projects that have been blocked because of a SEPA objection on the basis of the risk of flooding?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

Such schemes are often not within the curtilage of one landowner—they might cover an estate—so paragraph 32 is saying that the legislation is not clear on who is responsible for maintaining them. Do you accept that point?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Graham Simpson

I want to quote a couple of other things from the report. First—this relates to an earlier question from the convener—paragraph 32 says:

“Not all critical responsibilities for managing flood risk are covered by legislation. For example, the Act does not set out who is responsible for the maintenance of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems and for managing erosion enhanced flooding (Exhibit 2). This could mean important areas of activity may be missed.”

Do any of you know who is responsible? Mr Flucker, I am looking at you and you are looking at me, so perhaps you can answer.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of UHI Perth”

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Graham Simpson

On that point, you are saying that this was a one-off. The year that we are discussing is the only year for which there has been no budget.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2023/24 audit of UHI Perth”

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Graham Simpson

Okay. Paragraph 16 on page 7 of the report says:

“UHI Perth’s appointed auditor”—

who I assume is Nicola Wright—

“informed the board that the preparation and monitoring of a budget is a crucial element of monitoring the financial position of the college. The auditor recommended that the college produce and monitor a budget each financial year.”

That is just a statement of the obvious. At what point did you have that discussion, and what was the response?