The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2352 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Therefore, basically, more people are getting ADP than were getting PIP.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I was struck by exhibit 11, which is about
“Scottish census results indicating additional demands on ADP.”
It goes through a number of things, such as long-term illness, disease or condition, mental health conditions, physical disability and so on. Between 2011 and 2022, health has got worse in Scotland on all those indicators. How does that compare to the data in England and Wales? Is it the same picture there?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I suppose that it goes back to my first question. Some of the figures are actually quite stark: in 2011, 4.4 per cent of the population had a mental condition, and it was up to 11.3 per cent in 2022; the figures for long-term illness, disease or condition have gone up from 18.7 per cent to 21.4 per cent; and there is even an increase in the percentage of the population with physical disabilities.
If that trend continues, the demands for ADP will increase. If, for some reason, things are managed differently—and improved—in England and Wales, the gap will widen, will it not? Ultimately, it comes down to whether there are other ways to reduce demand that involve making the population healthier.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I have one more question, which is about the redetermination rates for ADP. The rates are higher than they are for PIP, but appeal success rates are lower. What does that tell us about whether ADP decisions are delivering accurate decisions the first time? Does more specific analysis need to be done?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Graham Simpson
The report looks at performance data and client feedback. You suggest that the process seems a little bit—this is my word—woolly. Is it fair to say that it is not detailed enough?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Graham Simpson
So you look at the shortlist for every health board chair.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Have you ever done that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Graham Simpson
What happened in that case?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Graham Simpson
I presume that, eventually, they have.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Graham Simpson
Earlier, the convener used a phrase that pointed to the existence of an impression that there is of a revolving door of people in quangos. You did not fully accept that, but if we look at health board chairs, the convener and I have a good example in the region that we represent. The former chair of NHS Lanarkshire is now the chair of NHS Forth Valley. Do you consider it an appropriate state of affairs for someone to be able to jump from one role to the other like that?