The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
The Electoral Commission’s position is clear: it does not want to draft subordinate legislation, but it would like to be consulted on it. I am quite happy to respect that it is the Government’s job to draft the legislation. You would expect that to be the commission’s position.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Mr Kidd, the power that you are talking about relates to the recall element of the bill and not to the non-attendance element of the bill.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Non-attendance is entirely separate, and I presume that the committee is content with that. The power relates only to the recall element.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to follow on from the convener’s line of questioning. I do not know whether you are a fan of the TV programme “Dragon’s Den”, but I am. One of the questions that the investors often ask is, “How will I get a return on my money if I invest in you?” They are thinking of an exit strategy. Does the investment bank ask that kind of question when it is making these investments? Ultimately, it needs to get a return.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Maybe we will get a chance to ask it.
You mentioned in the report—and I think that it has come up already in the questioning—the business of staff getting bonuses, which is not normal in the public sector, as you recognise. Given the nature of the business—let us call it that, because it is a bank—is it appropriate that bonuses are paid when they are generally not paid elsewhere in the public sector?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I am thinking out loud here. You have said that it is too early to say whether many of those investments will pay off. Why are we paying bonuses if it is too early to say whether various investments have paid off?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
But when it makes that investment, has it got an exit strategy? If you put in, say, £10 million, A, you are not going to want to lose that money and, B, you will want to make a profit. Do you think that it has such a plan for its various investments?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
I was a member of the Economy and Fair Work Committee when we looked at the matter in June 2023. I put it to Willie Watt, the chair of the board, that the bank had demonstrated a lack of due diligence and had not thought things through. He told me:
“Sometimes people make mistakes, sometimes people get things wrong, and sometimes the facts turn out to be different from what we thought they would be.”
He also said that the bank
“will make losses on investments”.—[Official Report, Economy and Fair Work Committee, 21 June 2023; c 7.]
Well, we know that. Has the bank learned any lessons from that calamitous investment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. That is really useful.
Looking across the bank’s investment portfolio, I can see that it is made up of mostly small to medium-sized Scotland-based companies that need a helping hand to get to the next stage of their development. That is all great, but the case that the convener was asking about, the Gresham House Forestry Fund, is not in that category. It is an investment fund that certainly did not need Scottish Government money. Is that an appropriate investment for the bank to make?