The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2770 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you convener. [Interruption.] My microphone seems not to be working. It is now.
I will stick to the theme and ask about Historic Environment Scotland, which appears in the consolidated accounts. As you said earlier, you have produced a report on it, which was out yesterday. I was aghast when I read it. It reminded me of WICS and the work that we did on that. Some aspects of the report were very familiar.
HES had no chief executive or accountable officer for six months. There were other aspects that I found very concerning, and that is concerning in itself.
Complimentary tickets were dished out for events at HES venues almost willy-nilly. I do not know how many people were involved.
There were over 400 electronic purchasing cards—maybe there still are—and one in four members of staff had those cards.
There were some specific examples of wholly inappropriate spending, including on a leaving do for a board member. Public money was used for somebody’s leaving do, including for a bar bill. I think that some of that was repaid. Some money was spent on a replacement kitchen. I do not know whether that was somebody’s personal kitchen or whether it was at an HES venue—it is not clear—but that bust the spending limit. There was also £2.9 million on the cancelled archive house project in Bonnyrigg.
Then we have—and this was very familiar from the WICS report—spending on foreign travel, almost half of which was not properly authorised. It gives the impression of an organisation in which controls are lax; in fact, spending was out of control. Would you concur with my analysis?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you. I will finish with a question on public sector pay policy. You mention it in paragraph 58, which I think is a significant paragraph. It refers to that policy, but the Government ignored the policy and rolled over to the unions. [Interruption.] Yes, I did not think that the convener would like that one, but that is what happened. As you say in the report,
“This introduces additional recurring financial pressures in the short term and has not mitigated the future year risks given many of the two-year deals agreed include inflation guarantees.”
Presumably, you think that the approach taken there is unsustainable.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you—and I say to the convener that I am sorry for annoying him.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. I know that you are going to come back and that we will ask you about it in more detail, but I wonder whether you know anything about the nature of the foreign travel that was undertaken. What were those trips for? Do you have any information about that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Will that impact on the services that it can deliver?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Just to be clear, this year it looks like it will be £11.4 million short?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Of course, I welcome the fact that the board did not need brokerage, but that masks bigger problems. There is the fact that it has had to rely on non-recurring savings. In the year that you have looked at, £18.9 million of the £36.1 million savings were recurring, so the rest were non-recurring. That is quite a significant figure, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Thanks, convener. I will leave it there.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
The report focuses on mental health, quite rightly, but there is a section that deals with the general financial situation in NHS Tayside. We have discussed the financial situation of other boards.
Other boards have had to have brokerage from the Scottish Government—another way of putting that would be that they have been bailed out—but luckily NHS Tayside did not need any of that in 2024-25 to break even. However, it did rely on non-recurring savings and there were some late allocations. For me, that poses a bit of a risk. Do you agree?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Graham Simpson
Except that the Scottish Government has made it clear—I am not quite sure how it will achieve this, given the state of play in a number of boards—that it will not entertain any more brokerage. NHS Tayside has a shortfall of £11.4 million. I am not asking you to come up with a solution for the Government, but you can see the problem, can you not?