The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1857 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
What is it that they want?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
That is useful. Some of that could come within the bracket of hammering the motorist, if I could put it that way. As Gail Macgregor pointed out earlier, the introduction of many of those measures in any city is potentially controversial. That is what makes it difficult to introduce them.
To go back to what you said earlier, cabinet secretary, and to what you said in the chamber in March, have you now dropped the 20 per cent target?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Does Transport Scotland have any more information on that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes—and you know that I always try to be helpful.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Good morning, everyone. I will not go around all the witnesses, because there are quite a few of you. I will start with you, cabinet secretary. I gave you a double thumbs up earlier when you said that you accepted that we should use miles rather than kilometres. Can you just confirm that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I agree. I labour the point that we use miles, not kilometres, in this country, but every witness so far has talked in kilometres. If I ask you how far you travel from Linlithgow to Edinburgh, you will give me a figure in miles, not kilometres, because that is the way that people talk.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I think that you mentioned that two cities are looking for a regulatory framework.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Can you be more specific and say what it is that they are actually looking for? What do they want to do that they cannot do now?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
There are some final points from me. You mentioned the south city way, which is a good example of how things should be done. That is in Glasgow, of course—I have used it. You mentioned the electrification of the East Kilbride line; I am very much looking forward to being able to use the train again when the line reopens on, I think, 18 May.
I come to my final question. Gail Macgregor mentioned integrated ticketing, which we have spoken about many times. Where are we with that? My frustration has been that it is taking far too long.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Graham Simpson
Can you provide some clarity on the phrase “international standards” in amendment 1088? The amendment suggests that there should be a review of women’s refuges that considers international standards, but standards across the world will vary—there will be different standards in every country. I am not sure what you want to achieve with the amendment. I acknowledge that you are not going to move it, but do you see the problem there?