The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1865 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
So one was approved by Mr Tydeman.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I cannot remember when David Tydeman was fired. To save me looking it up, was that before or after the report was concluded?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I completely agree with that. Mr McMillan and I have been in meetings in which we, and others, have argued that the yard needs investment to modernise in order to be able to compete for orders, and ultimately to return to the private sector, which was the Government’s ambition for the yard. It needs to modernise—I am in no doubt that that is required.
However, if the yard does not win any of the small vessel replacement programme work, how much extra work does it need to be able to continue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I will express it in another way. Let us say that the yard gets to September and it has finished the Glen Rosa, which is off and sailing, and carrying passengers, and there is no further work. How long can the yard continue, in your view, without extra work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes, but at some point, the Government is going to have to make a decision on what it does about the future of the yard.
I have a couple of other questions. At paragraph 7 of your report, you mention “Under Recoveries funding”. Can you tell us what that is? According to your report, it amounts to £1 million per month.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Thank you, convener—my question follows on from some of your earlier questions.
Auditor General, from reading your report and hearing the evidence today, in which we have heard about big payments being made without permission, it seems to me that the situation at FMPG has a bit of a Water Industry Commission for Scotland feel to it. You know about the work that we have been doing on money that was being spent without approval at WICS.
The convener asked about the case of the secondee who ultimately set up a limited company. That fact was discovered by the accountable officer. Was it discovered before the previous chief executive was sacked?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Was it Mr Tydeman who approved the arrangement?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
I will follow on from the line of questioning about Ferguson Marine’s business plan. According to you, the plan
“assumed the direct award of the contract for the Small Vessel Replacement Programme”.
It was wrong to make that assumption, as it cannot be assumed that the firm is going to get that work. Indeed, it later transpired that the firm is now one of six firms in line for that contract, so there is no guarantee that it will get it. Does that not fatally hull the business plan?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Before John Boyd comes in on that, can you say whether there has there been any attempt to change the business plan in light of the new development that means that the firm has to compete for the work? I think that it was entirely predictable that that would be the case. Has Ferguson Marine done any revision to the business plan?