Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 17 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2022 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Sustainable transport: Reducing car use”

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Graham Simpson

I agree. I labour the point that we use miles, not kilometres, in this country, but every witness so far has talked in kilometres. If I ask you how far you travel from Linlithgow to Edinburgh, you will give me a figure in miles, not kilometres, because that is the way that people talk.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Sustainable transport: Reducing car use”

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Graham Simpson

I think that you mentioned that two cities are looking for a regulatory framework.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Sustainable transport: Reducing car use”

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Graham Simpson

Can you be more specific and say what it is that they are actually looking for? What do they want to do that they cannot do now?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Sustainable transport: Reducing car use”

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Graham Simpson

There are some final points from me. You mentioned the south city way, which is a good example of how things should be done. That is in Glasgow, of course—I have used it. You mentioned the electrification of the East Kilbride line; I am very much looking forward to being able to use the train again when the line reopens on, I think, 18 May.

I come to my final question. Gail Macgregor mentioned integrated ticketing, which we have spoken about many times. Where are we with that? My frustration has been that it is taking far too long.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 27 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Can you provide some clarity on the phrase “international standards” in amendment 1088? The amendment suggests that there should be a review of women’s refuges that considers international standards, but standards across the world will vary—there will be different standards in every country. I am not sure what you want to achieve with the amendment. I acknowledge that you are not going to move it, but do you see the problem there?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Graham Simpson

The conclusion is that, if the tax gap is widened, potentially even fewer people will come and the money will go down even further.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Graham Simpson

When?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Graham Simpson

That was for 2018-19. Have you done any analysis on other years? Has there been any analysis on how that gap might change in the future if the tax gap was to widen further?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Yes, I get that. The figures show that there has been net migration to Scotland, but you have said in your paper that there has been a financial loss because of the tax difference.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Administration of Scottish income tax 2023-24”

Meeting date: 26 March 2025

Graham Simpson

Alyson Stafford, in response to Mr Beattie, you referred to a number of reports that were published in April last year. One of those was an HMRC paper, so it might be that HMRC should respond to this question—you can decide between you. The HMRC paper, which is called “Impacts of 2018 to 2019 Scottish Income Tax changes on intra-UK migration and labour market participation”—a nice short title—says:

“In total, we estimate a loss in NSND Income Tax”—

which means non-savings, non-dividend income tax—

“from cross-border migration of £60.6 million”.

In other words, £60 million would have stayed in Scotland if tax bands had not changed. Is that correct?