The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2022 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I am looking at section 42 of the bill. We are always asked to bring a copy of the bill, and I have done so. There is no mention of students in section 42. That is why I have lodged my amendments.
I think that the minister gets the issue—I am pretty sure that he understands it. I will take him up on the second offer that he has made to engage with me ahead of stage 3, but I have to tell him that I take the issue extremely seriously; if he is not prepared to work with me to draft something for stage 3, I will do it myself, because it really matters.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Will the minister take an intervention?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I would like to ask for some clarity. Sarah Boyack talked about creating a national register. What level of detail would that go into? I presume that that would not be a register that names individuals as being homeless but would, rather, be a register that collects the numbers of homeless people. Have I got that right?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I would like some clarity. The minister says that he supports an amendment from Bob Doris, which is not being considered by this committee, so it will not be voted on today. He also mentioned amendment 1012, which was lodged by Alexander Stewart. To be clear, is the minister saying that he thinks that, if Mr Doris’s amendment is agreed to, Mr Stewart’s amendment is not necessary? We cannot know whether Mr Doris’s amendment will be agreed to, because it is not being considered today, and it is being considered by a different committee. If it is not agreed to—I am sure that it will be, but if it is not—will the minister be minded to support Mr Stewart’s amendment?
10:15Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Graham Simpson
I am listening carefully to what the minister is saying. I do not think that Jamie Halcro Johnston is at all suggesting that somebody who goes out in the wilds for a walk and maybe takes a tent with them, with the intention of going home the next day, is rough sleeping. Surely the minister is not suggesting that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Put me on the smart ticketing board and I will give you a hand.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay, but the Auditor General says, in paragraph 14 of his report:
“To achieve the target, car traffic levels will need to decrease by 7.3 billion kilometres”
—he has fallen into the kilometres trap there—
“to 29.3 billion compared to a 2019 baseline. The last time car traffic levels were at this level was in 1994.”
That spells out just how tough it is—not just for you, but for councils—does it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
The target was always challenging, was it not? Some people might say that it was unrealistic.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
You do not have to be wrong. Transport Scotland can get it right by using miles in all its documentation. That is what it should do. Anyway, that is not why we are here, but I will take that as a small victory.
How did we come up with the 20 per cent figure? I know that Mr Nicol kind of answered that, but, from the Government’s point of view, how was that figure arrived at?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Graham Simpson
A review. Is that Edinburgh and Glasgow?