The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2215 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I will focus on Clare Adamson’s amendment 211. I listened very carefully to the arguments. I was not sure about the amendment, particularly when listening to the minister; however, when Clare Adamson spoke, she persuaded me. She made a very powerful argument as to why the amendment should go forward. She said that she would not move the amendment, but I urge her to do so, because I would like to know what the committee’s view of it would be. If members had listened to Clare Adamson, they would have to have been persuaded by what she said.
I say to Ben Macpherson that, if he feels confident that the minister’s assurance about stage 3 is strong enough, that is fine. He, too, made a strong argument, and could move his amendments 122 and 123. However, if he is assured by what the minister said, he should not do so.
I strongly urge Clare Adamson to move amendment 211.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
My question follows on from that. Do you see this role being taken on by an existing or brand new body?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I will.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I am going to refer to the amendment in my later comments, but I want Bob Doris to clear something up for me, if he can. What does he mean by the global south? I cannot find any precise definition of that. It could be a very long list of countries.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
It is entirely up to the committee, but if we are to take the pragmatic approach suggested by Sarah Boyack—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I am curious. I know that Mark Ruskell is saying that he would like to leave that to Government, but it is his amendment. It refers to
“giving priority to materials which are most harmful or polluting”.
How would we define that? How would we establish what is most harmful or polluting?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
Does Mark Ruskell accept that there is already a timescale in the bill? It is two years. I am just suggesting that it should be one year or six months—preferably one year, as I said earlier.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
If Mr Doris is prepared to clear up the point, I will give way again.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
I am always happy to have conversations with Ms Lennon—she knows that. I was going to say that if we are to take the pragmatic approach suggested by Ms Boyack—I am a pragmatist—the committee would go for one year rather than six months. If I had a preference, it would be for a year, but others might have a different view.
Maurice Golden invites us to agree that the circular economy strategy should be co-designed with the public sector, private sector and third sector bodies. I was a little surprised that Mr Golden used that awful phrase “co-design”, which is so favoured by those who want to sound well-meaning but do not really mean it. He is not in that camp at all, being a circular economy titan. Phraseology aside, he is right to say that the production of any such strategy should not be left to ministers and civil servants alone.
I turn to my good friend Bob Doris, whose amendment 187, which was absolutely fascinating, also suggests people who should be consulted. I am not really sure what the amendment means by “relevant policy makers” or “human right defenders”, which could mean almost anyone, but its call for
“environmental experts from the Global South”
to be included has me most foxed. Mr Doris has not really cleared that up, because he does not—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Graham Simpson
Will the member take an intervention?