The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 606 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Maurice Golden
My amendments 174, 176, 179, 180 and 181 are on the measurement of targets. The bill says that the Scottish ministers must specify the manner in which indicators or progress made on the targets are to be measured. That is akin to someone marking their own homework and is not in alignment with other target-setting legislation. For example, section 2B of the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 provides for target-setting criteria for the climate change targets. My package of amendments replicates the target-setting criteria in the 2009 act and applies them to the bill.
My amendment 182 entrusts the evaluation of progress towards meeting the targets to Environmental Standards Scotland and gives ESS the authority to evaluate whether targets have been met. That would require ESS to notify the Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament of that evaluation, while retaining the provisions for the Scottish ministers’ accountability to the Scottish Parliament, as well as their ability to self-declare if a target is no longer achievable.
My amendment 188 would require the Scottish ministers to seek and have regard to the views of the relevant committee of the Scottish Parliament with respect to targets or topics.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I will focus my remarks on my amendment 195 only. Amendment 195 is relatively simple and would make it explicit that any review or update to the documents listed in the amendment must have regard to each other.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Given the United Kingdom National Screening Committee’s planned review of evidence on population screening for sudden cardiac death, what role might the Scottish Government play in that regard? Moreover, what additional steps is the Scottish Government taking to improve data collection, classification and public reporting of sudden cardiac deaths, particularly in young people?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I fully agree with Mr Ewing, but it is a bit unfortunate that—as far as I can make out—the petitioner’s local authority did not respond. Perhaps the petitioner could take that up with local councillors.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Just so that I am clear, at ground level, what has changed is that the biological sex will now be recorded but, in essence, the treatment of the individuals will be exactly the same. Is that where we are currently?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Is that happening as we speak?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
I appreciate that there will be an independent review, but three years is an awfully long time. What is the Scottish Government’s current assessment of how effective screening might be in preventing sudden cardiac death? I am thinking about any issues with false positives or negative results as a consequence of screening.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
Minister, I hope that this suggestion, which follows on from Mr Ewing’s, will also be helpful. I have a Union of European Football Associations C licence for football coaching. As part of the journey to that, there is an online element of first aid training, but CPR is not included in it. Every football coach in Scotland must do the level 1.1 coaching course, and first aid is part of that. Will you commit to engaging with the Scottish Football Association and Scottish Women’s Football on CPR being included as part of that coaching pathway? The point about schools is a good one, and my suggestion is another mechanism through which we can get the message out there in a structured environment.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Maurice Golden
That is helpful clarity. I wondered why the work was taking so long, but I appreciate that it might have been because of the different historical information technology systems at Police Scotland. How is the recording of any identified gender delimited on the new system? Is the person literally just recorded as a trans person or are there different ways in which the person might identify?
11:00