Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2321 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Housing to 2040

Meeting date: 20 February 2024

Willie Coffey

I will get as close to the microphone as I can, and I will shout.

In your initial remarks, you also mentioned the importance of human protection schemes. Do you see there being an increasing reliance on those schemes in order to help with the problem at that level?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Housing to 2040

Meeting date: 20 February 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you very much.

John, you indicated that you wanted to contribute.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Housing to 2040

Meeting date: 20 February 2024

Willie Coffey

Are there any other views on quality?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

All the governance issues are the subject of the committee’s concerns and focus this morning, but what about the commission’s overall performance? What is expected of it as a commission? You have said that it is quite profitable in some of its engagements, but how is it judged on its performance and what it does? Who is looking after its performance, outcomes and targets? Where are we with that?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

Had you not done that, no one would have sought retrospective approval and we would never have heard anything about the matter.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

My questions are about the impact of all this on the commission’s ability to carry out its functions properly, and a little bit on the reserves and surpluses that you mentioned a wee minute ago. First, what is your assessment of the impact of the situation on the commission’s ability to carry out its duties and functions since the section 22 report revealed it?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

I think that colleagues will come in on that.

The commission is reporting surpluses of more than £1 million and reserves of £3.4 million. Is that unusual for a public body of that size? What will ultimately happen to that reserve? Where does it go?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

Ultimately, it would be to the benefit of consumers of Scottish Water if that profit goes back.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

I know that colleagues are waiting to come in on some of the other key issues in the report. Thank you for those answers.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland”

Meeting date: 8 February 2024

Willie Coffey

On the retrospective approval email, I would think that, if you were seeking such approval, some alarm must have been raised for that to happen. However, nobody seemed to be aware of anything, and the audit and risk committee did not know about it. Who raised the alarm that led to a retrospective request being made?