The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2378 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Have we lost that sense under the community planning partnership model? Did communities—perhaps you can speak best to the communities in your area—feel that they were part of a ground-up movement that could do this sort of thing? Did they feel slightly limited in their ability to achieve things for their community under that model?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
In that case, I thank everyone for their answers.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Pamela Clifford, on the impact that NPF4 has already had, particularly in relation to flood risk assessment, one of its unintended consequences is that, according to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency’s flood risk assessment, we have perhaps suddenly rendered liable to increased flood risk housing settlements that were not previously assessed as being at risk of flooding. How do you see that situation? How can we manage the problem on behalf of residents who bought their house when it was not assessed as being at risk of flooding only to find that it suddenly now is?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you. I will ask my next two questions together, if that is okay. Do you welcome the Government’s planning hub and the national planning improvement champion? Do you think that they will make a contribution in progressing NPF4 locally?
11:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks, Caroline. Is there anyone online who wants to come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. Thanks for all your question responses so far. I want to ask a broad question about planning resources, which we have touched on a wee bit. Do you see planning resources as having increased since NPF4 arrived, or is the position pretty much as it was before?
You will be delighted to know that there has been some discussion about ring fencing planning fees for planning departments and so on—no sooner had we got rid of ring fencing than it came back again like the tide. What are your views on planning resources, whether they have improved and whether they should be ring fenced?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. My question is probably for Jackie Taylor from South Lanarkshire Council, but I would be obliged if our other two colleagues were able to respond, too.
Jackie, you will have heard committee members say that we were down in Irvine in North Ayrshire on Monday, where we met fantastic local people who deliver local projects there, as well as some great officials, who provide support.
My colleague Lorna Slater mentioned the diagnostic tool that North Ayrshire Council has developed. I am keen to ask you whether South Lanarkshire Council has been able to do something similar. Your authority has a big area and many communities to cover; it stretches all the way from Rutherglen away down to Biggar, it includes East Kilbride, and there are small villages all over the place. Do you intend to embark on a diagnostic process that engages with communities at their level to understand their needs, their hopes and their aspirations for what community wealth building could bring them?
12:00Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Willie Coffey
We were keen to see a copy of that tool, because it is not something that would appear in a Scottish Parliament bill. It is something that is very local and meaningful to the communities that have to deliver it.
We asked the community groups what makes the whole process work. It is the people who deliver and drive it—the local officials and local community groups and their enthusiasm, determination and dedication to build and improve community wealth building—that make it work, not the bill. Do you see that in abundance in South Lanarkshire? Are you well placed to get a meeting of minds between the officials who are determined to deliver it and the community groups who are keen to exploit it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Willie Coffey
I see that Dr Crighton wants to come in.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Willie Coffey
I have a final question for Jane Martin, which is a bit like the one that Daniel Johnson asked. What role do you see Scottish Enterprise having in the community wealth building process? How do you see the organisation working with, say, South Lanarkshire Council to grow and develop the whole principle of community wealth building?