Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2544 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

Is the Scottish Government making it clear to our UK Government colleagues that it is our wish that that scrutiny function remains in Scotland, where it previously was?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

Has there been a response to that yet?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

Mr Gove is downstairs at the moment. Could we invite him up to give us that clarification? [Laughter.]

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

Auditor General, I am still reading the report. That status change was made only in April 2020. We might argue that Scottish Canals would struggle to be able to deliver the extent of the fixed asset register re-evaluation in that timeframe. The more important question is whether Scottish Canals is getting on with that now. Are you confident that the organisation is aware of what must be done and of the demands that you have outlined in the FReM and that Joanne Brown described to us? Does the organisation have the skills and capacity to do the work now and as quickly as possible?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I have a question on the Scottish Government’s investment and financial support that have been provided to private companies, as is mentioned in the Auditor General’s report. As an Ayrshire MSP, one of the significant ones for me is Glasgow Prestwick Airport Ltd. Could you give us a brief outline of why that investment was made? What would the implications have been, had that investment not been made in Prestwick airport?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

We know that there are about 300 jobs linked directly to the airport and about 1,400 spin-off jobs associated with the wider Ayrshire economy. We know that the airport is pivotal to the Ayrshire local authorities in terms of taking the Ayrshire Growth Deal forward and in relation to their hopes and aspirations for the possible spaceport in Ayrshire.

I will just ask you again—and, perhaps, your officials, who have been in post for longer than you have, Mr Marks—had the Scottish Government not made that investment, would the airport still be functioning?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

It is hugely important for us in Ayrshire, but from a financial perspective, the committee and the Auditor General are asking about the financial implications of longer-term support, in the absence of a buyer. Can you say anything about progress in that regard?

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

My question is on the European structural and investment funds issue that is also covered in the Auditor General’s report. We know that the UK Government committed to replacing those funds, which came from the European Union, and that an estimated £183 million a year is coming to Scotland.

First, has that sum been confirmed yet? Secondly, and importantly for the committee, what is to be the role of the committee, the Scottish Parliament and Audit Scotland in scrutinising that spend and accounting for it in Scotland? We did that previously but, as far as I know, none of us is aware of where the scrutiny function will lie for that funding. It might fall under the shared prosperity or levelling up funds and so on, but we do not know yet. We do not even know whether the Scottish Parliament will have the same role in scrutinising the spend that we had previously. I would be obliged if you could clarify any of that for the committee.

Public Audit Committee

Section 22 Report: “The 2020/21 audit of Scottish Canals”

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Willie Coffey

The transition of Scottish Canals from a public body to an NDPB seems to have brought about many or most of the issues. Paragraph 10 of the report says that the decision to change the status from public body to NDPB resulted from a review by the Office for National Statistics. Did no one think that that would put a bit of a millstone around the neck of Scottish Canals? Joanne Brown described the substantial change in requirements. Being one type of body or the other makes a substantial difference to how the assets are accounted for. Did nobody think about that before the decision was made about changing the organisation’s status?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Willie Coffey

In the absence of new proposals that might be delivered within the context of NPF4, how do we deal with the high streets that have—as we saw yesterday—empty, abandoned and derelict cinemas and shops, with trees growing out of them and graffiti all over the windows? There are no plans or proposals coming from the communities at the moment for any of that stuff. Are the planning powers that we have sufficient to deal with any of that?

Local people ask me what they can do about the problem and how they can help to improve the powers that the planning authorities need so that they can intervene and turn those areas around. There is a hope that NPF4 will embrace that and allow the local authorities to intervene more directly to improve the look, feel and vibrancy of built heritage in the urban setting that has been dormant and abandoned for so long. Anything that you could say on that would be very welcome, minister.