The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2465 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener.
Before we come to that, Auditor General, I noticed that, last week, we did not touch on the European structural funds and their replacement. Did you make any comment on the replacement funds and where, within that, the audit process for Scotland sits? We are unclear about that so far, but can you update us on your perspective on what your role will be, if you will have one, and whether there will be a role for the Parliament and this committee?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Are you saying that that is recognised by the Government, or do we have to persuade the Government that it might want to adopt such an approach?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Are the consolidated accounts the place for that or do we need something different on performance in specific policy areas? Should it be woven into the consolidated accounts or should we ask the Government to consider a separate performance report or document, which we have never had? Is that where we are going? Does the Government recognise that there is an issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Your report says that the legal advice that was obtained by the commissioner’s office confirmed that the investigation process, which we understand was amended in 2020, and the assessment process did not comply with the legislation. Was the process compliant before 2020? Is it compliant now? Where are we on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Professor Sparks, I invite you to respond to my third question. You might have heard me say that, in its local development plans, East Ayrshire Council finds it difficult to repurpose or reuse for housing or anything else, brownfield sites that are adjacent to rivers because of the flood risk, which seems to be on the increase. Do you have any thoughts about how we could overcome that? It will certainly not be done in the short term but, if we are serious about the success of NPF4, regenerating towns and building for communities, we need to solve that problem with inner urban redevelopment. How do we possibly marry NPF4 and flood risk assessment to give town centres some hope of recovery post Covid and post anything else?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
How do we reach out to the private sector and get it on board with plans? I do not think that people in the private sector are sitting reading NPF4. How do we get them around the table, and how do we get them to make a contribution?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Absolutely.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that, because it leads me on to my second question. We have heard how in urban settings—not just in Kilmarnock but in any town in Scotland—there are difficulties with empty and derelict shops, buildings and land, and with abandonment. Most of that stuff is in private ownership. Do we have sufficient powers to deal with that issue? Indeed, is that the right way of going about it?
There are several buildings and shops in the town of Kilmarnock, which I represent, that it is proving almost impossible to get the managing agents even to clean. Some people seem to prefer to retain ownership of the properties while doing nothing to improve their look or feel, and that contributes to the overall sense of decay in the town centre. How do we turn that around? How do we engage with those owners, agents and others and get them to take a stake in this and be part of the redevelopment of towns? Professor Hague, do you have any views to offer on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
Those were really helpful responses from all three witnesses. Thank you for that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Willie Coffey
During yesterday’s discussion, we also heard about the difficulties that towns such as Kilmarnock—or just about any town in Scotland, really—have in dealing with empty or derelict shops and buildings and abandoned pieces of land in the urban setting. I direct this question to Barbara Cummins. Many of those buildings and shops are in private ownership. My constituents ask me why public money should be spent on rescuing properties that blight our town centres, many of them having been deliberately left in a near-abandoned and ruined state. If we are serious about the NPF4 allowing us to turn that around, the private sector needs to have a role in making a contribution to the strategy. Do you recognise that point and do you agree with it?