The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Willie Coffey
We are always concerned that people who are not in the digital arena can still participate and that they do not feel that there is a barrier. We will have to see how that progresses.
I have other questions about the technology assurance framework that Colin Beattie asked about. Dharshi Santhakumaran said that the latest review gave the project amber/green status. What are the amber parts of that? Do we have any concerns?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Finally, I turn to the IT side. Members have talked about that aspect, and it has come before the committee a number of times over the years. Are you satisfied that NRS has the required skills, experience and leadership in IT to enable the project to be successfully delivered?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I have a couple of questions. The first one continues the discussion on the impact on rural communities, and the second will be on costs that are likely to come up.
What impacts would the proposed legislation have on, for example, a small rural business in south-west Scotland or the Highlands, compared with a business in the city of Edinburgh? Should the proposed licensing scheme apply in both locations and circumstances? Maybe David Weston and Amanda Cupples could respond to that first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Our witnesses have raised the issue of cost several times. The information that we have in front of us indicates a cost of between £200 and £400 for a three-year licence, but Fiona Campbell said that it could be much higher. If we believe the figures that we have, the cost would work out at roughly £1.30 to £2.60 per week. Why do you believe that it would be much higher than that? What discussions have you had, if any, with the local authorities that would have discretion to introduce the fee?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Do any of the other witnesses have comments on the licensing fee issue that Fiona Campbell has not made?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Willie Coffey
What is the position now? Has the commission said to the Government that the legislation is perhaps not fit for purpose?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I will finish by following up on the questions that Richard Leonard asked about the improvement plan and looking to the future.
There have been several mentions of the recommendations and the fact that 33 out of 41 recommendations have been achieved. Who agrees that those have been achieved?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Willie Coffey
I have a final question. Will Deloitte conduct a follow-up audit to check whether it agrees that the recommendations have been completed satisfactorily?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Willie Coffey
Good morning to everyone on the panel. Given where we are, it is probably too early to gaze ahead beyond the pandemic, but I invite Mary Morgan and Caroline Lamb to say a few words about the remobilisation plan that they have been asked to work on.
Mary, in your opening remarks, you gave us some great examples of the achievements that we have seen, and you particularly mentioned the digital aspect, such as the use of Teams. As part of the remobilisation plan and getting back to business as usual, will we retain some of those good elements of practice which, although they were forced on us, have turned out to be very advantageous for the way in which we and your staff work? Could you give us a flavour of how you see that going ahead? Will we retain the best of what came out as a result of Covid?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Willie Coffey
That is pretty amazing, actually. The technology worked with 900 people online at the same time, did it?