The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2544 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
The previous two panels were at pains to emphasise local variability in delivery of services. We have information and evidence—for example, from the Improvement Service’s local government benchmarking framework—that shows differences not in how services are delivered, but in performance. The idea is that the national care service will improve performance and make it consistent. Why are there such differences? Are they down only to localism, or are there real differences in performance and the level of service that people get across Scotland?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
That was clear, Ewan. Thank you for that.
I have a question for Yvette Burgess. The CCPS submission talks about the importance of flexibility and collaboration at the local level. Other witnesses have talked about that at great length this morning. Are those threatened by the bill or can they be enhanced, retained and protected by it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning. That comment brings me to the question that I had in mind for you. Audit Scotland’s “Social care briefing” identified a number of issues, most of which require urgent attention. How do those sit alongside the plans to introduce a national care service? Can they run in parallel? Clearly, the national care service will be a longer-term change, but you identified in the report that some urgent action is required. Will you expand on your concerns relating to tackling the urgent and pressing needs?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
My next question is for COSLA and SOLACE. On the flip side of that, the Audit Scotland report identified that, although we know that a huge amount of public money is spent on social care,
“progress in moving to more preventative approaches to delivering social care has been limited.”
What are your views on that? Perhaps both Eddies could comment on that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
That is probably enough from me, in the interest of bringing in other colleagues.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
However, we agree that there is inconsistency across Scotland in delivering the outcomes that we all seek. How do we address that without a national model that could apply the standards that Eddie Fraser described earlier? How, without national application of standards, would we improve consistency in authorities where it is needed?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Are there any other comments about flexibility and collaboration? Will we lose them or can we retain and develop them under the bill?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that, Ashley.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Willie Coffey
On Monday, the workers said to us that they were fed up with the whole issue being used as a political football. I am sure that we all know that there is an inevitability to that, but they were fed up with it.
Can you offer some words of comfort and support to the members of the workforce, to show them that we value the work that they are doing and that we recognise that they are playing a crucial role in helping us to complete projects that will ultimately benefit the public when the ships go into service?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 4 November 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, First Minister. It may be a little early to come in on lessons learned, but I hope to pick up on a point that was raised earlier, on which you gave some information.
One of the early messages that the committee got on the project concerned the lack of technical rigour that was applied at the outset to determine the yard’s capabilities to build the ships, in terms of its facilities and so on, and the skills and expertise of the workforce to build the designs that were presented to them. For example, the vessels had a clamshell-door design, and we heard from the workers that they had never built ships to that design before.
I realise that you cannot possibly be aware of the details of that at that stage, but perhaps you can say something about the importance of technical design and rigour, and a thorough assessment of technical capabilities, at the outset of such a project. Is that one of the key lessons that we are learning from the experience?