Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2321 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Allotments

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Is the asset transfer process in the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 being deployed to break down the barriers to accessing pieces of land?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Allotments

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Thanks for that. I think that Richard Crawford wanted to come.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Allotments

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everybody. I want to explore with you the difference between formal allotments and non-allotment growing spaces, which Lou Evans has mentioned several times. My own local authority, East Ayrshire Council, does not run any allotments because, in its judgment, the demand is met by other means—community growing spaces here, there and everywhere. Is there an opportunity, across Scotland, to get the numbers in the formal allotment waiting list process down by developing better, newer, more imaginative processes of community growing? I ask Lou Evans for her thoughts on that.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Allotments

Meeting date: 31 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Let me turn to Stuart McKenzie. I am curious to know what is happening here. You said that about 5,000 people might be waiting for an allotment. What is causing 5,000 people to be waiting for an allotment in Edinburgh when there is nobody waiting for a community growing space in East Ayrshire? What is happening that is different?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

I will raise again the issue of the application of quality standards, which Colin Beattie led on a moment ago.

In his key messages, the Auditor General told us that some of the project milestones were not clearly defined and that there was no linkage to any quality standards that may be an accepted part of that particular industry.

Roy, do you have a view on why we were not insisting on a connection between the milestones in the project and the quality standards that should have been applicable at each point?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Okay. We can probably investigate that further in the next session.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

It is a recurring issue that, when the committee considers any project, it often finds that, if the project goes wrong at the beginning, it is unlikely to work at the end, as insufficient rigour was applied at the outset. Not applying quality standards to milestones seems to committee members to be a major issue.

Paragraph 138 of the Auditor General’s report told us that

“some of the 1,400 cables”

installed on the first boat

“were too short”.

It is amazing to members of the committee and, perhaps, the public that that was not discovered and not reported to the Parliament until the turnaround director was involved in 2022. How on earth can something like that happen? How can cables that are too short go unseen and unnoticed for nearly four years and cause a significant delay? I connect that directly with the application of quality standards and inspection. Why was that missing in this case?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Should it not? It is ridiculous to be unable to challenge the fact that cables are too short on a boat and for that to remain the position for four years until somebody else—the turnaround director—comes on the scene to identify it. Surely, we must be considering that. I am aware that the observation reports were a mechanism to raise and highlight issues. In essence, they are change requests in the quality world, and the builder might or might not have carried them out. Surely to goodness that needs to be strengthened.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

I have a supplementary question on the convener’s line of questioning, Mr Brannen. Is the extent to which some parties are placing an emphasis on paper trails and the recording of decisions a fair reflection of how the Government works in practice? Are we dealing with the unmet expectations of some people or with failures to deliver on requirements? Which side of that line are we on? The issue has been a recurring one for the committee, and others, for some time.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 26 May 2022

Willie Coffey

Do all parties accept the point that the Auditor General made about the cables being too short, or is there some dispute about that?