The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2321 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
I am just talking about quality processes that give an agreed framework between a client and a contractor about what to do to resolve issues. Were they in place?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
I will move on to my final question on the issue. The Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee report also comments that there was
“evidence that the contractor deliberately proceeded to construct specific sections of the vessel either out of sequence or not according to the proper specification”.
What is your response to that and how does that fit in a quality process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
That is at the heart of any quality control or quality management process. However, the Auditor General’s report says that there were no quality processes in place to manage such issues.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Was that process agreed in advance? If you build anything—it does not matter what it is—you are bound to get change requests as you go along.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, Mr McColl. I will begin by following on from the convener’s question about the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee’s report, its comment on the
“appropriate level of design capabilities”
and so on. Clearly, you contest that finding. Did you get an opportunity to give evidence to that committee? Subsequently, when you saw the report, were you able to challenge those findings and set that out in detail?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
That is why we asked you the question. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
You mentioned the owner observation reports. The information that we have is that there were about 346 of them and that 180 were carried out while 166 were rejected or are still outstanding. Does that fall within normal quality management procedures where the customer requests changes and the person who is delivering the contract either agrees or disagrees that they can be made? Is that where the dispute resolution issue fell? Was there a failure to agree about changes or rejected change requests? How did that work?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for all that detail. The committee has been trying to get feedback on those issues, and your input today on the record is helping the committee to understand.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you. Would Karen Birch and Maria de la Torre like to comment on the 250m2 issue?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Willie Coffey
I am happy with those responses, convener, and happy to let colleagues come in.