The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2465 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
In the places that members have visited, it has been great to see such work going on. It is very much a case of ground-up community activists plus really good council officials working together. Everything that I have seen—perhaps other members have seen it—is ground up. There is no hierarchal diktat from the top going on at all. Local people have been keen to say that they do not want to be participating in huge, great big round tables like the community planning partnerships, where community members wait until the end of the meeting to have their say.
People tell us that their experience of the community wealth building process has been really different. With that in mind, do you think that that is a better approach? It is not enshrined in the bill, which is just about producing a plan. All the flexibilities that you seek to achieve in the ground-up nature are very much for councils and communities to get on with. Do you see it like that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Community wealth building is driven largely by really good community enthusiasts coming forward and excellent council officials who are making it work. How do they reach out and get help from the likes of your organisations to participate in and contribute to that? Stacey, your views would be welcome.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Matt, how do we get you involved?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
It is really good to hear that you are keen to be involved to a greater degree than perhaps you are at the moment. It is very encouraging. Thanks very much to everybody.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
So the ground-up approach is best.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Yes.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
The bill simply says that local authorities shall develop a community wealth building action plan; it does not say anything about timescales, punishments, fines or anything like that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Have we lost that sense under the community planning partnership model? Did communities—perhaps you can speak best to the communities in your area—feel that they were part of a ground-up movement that could do this sort of thing? Did they feel slightly limited in their ability to achieve things for their community under that model?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
In that case, I thank everyone for their answers.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Willie Coffey
Pamela Clifford, on the impact that NPF4 has already had, particularly in relation to flood risk assessment, one of its unintended consequences is that, according to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency’s flood risk assessment, we have perhaps suddenly rendered liable to increased flood risk housing settlements that were not previously assessed as being at risk of flooding. How do you see that situation? How can we manage the problem on behalf of residents who bought their house when it was not assessed as being at risk of flooding only to find that it suddenly now is?