The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2372 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Willie Coffey
If the bill proceeds and is enacted, at some future point will the Government look at the cost impact that businesses are concerned about if we review the effectiveness of the policy and the scheme?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Is work being undertaken to try to improve training across the board, for example, if that is the biggest element of concern?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Stephen Boyle referred to a piece of software that was in development but has stopped being in development. I am not clear what it was supposed to do. From what I see in your report, data exists at a local level, but it is difficult to assimilate that and provide a national picture without using the education management software. Can you tell us a little bit about what the software was meant to do and how work on it is progressing?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Our favourite subject is value for money. We are always interested in the definition of that, what it means, who sets the criteria and whether we can apply those criteria and use the data that we have to give us the answers that we seek. Where do we stand on that? Do we have in place criteria that are clear enough to assess and determine value for money for the whole scheme?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Is the main problem the fact that changing to a new vendor or a new software developer is not necessarily going to resolve data inconsistency? If it is there, it is there. Is work going on to try to make sure that the data that local councils collect is in a consistent form that allows the software to present us with the national picture? Is that one of the issues that sits at the heart of this?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
At the Public Audit Committee, the story of data gaps is a common and familiar one in a number of areas. Do you think that your messaging to the Government and its agencies about data, data quality and data gaps is fully understood so that such issues can be addressed, as you just hinted? Is it fully understood to enable us to develop and get the tool right?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
I emphasise that our ability to determine whether there has been value for money will depend largely on consistent, quality data being gathered and on that data being analysed fairly within councils and across the country as a whole.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Was the initial project abandoned three years ago? The report states that it has taken three years to get to where we are.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. I am always curious about what the actual cause of a software failure is when that comes to the committee. However, that is really crucial to allow us to make any progress in assessing the impact of the whole policy. I presume that this lies at the heart of it. If we are to be successful at all in evaluating the impact, outcomes and so on, we are going to need some kind of data analysis tool like that to draw on and to tell us what the picture is across Scotland as a whole. Is that fair to say?