The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1557 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
The Scottish dental practice owners group and NHS Orkney have raised concerns that we are not focusing enough on prevention, and that services are still too treatment based. I know from my time in the post of Minister for Public Health, Sport and Wellbeing that Tom Ferris feels passionately about prevention. Will you talk a bit about how the budget will support prevention as part of the evolution of NHS dentistry?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
We have talked about the figures of 60 per cent and 40 per cent in respect of access to dentistry. We know that a lot of the pressures that are experienced are shared across these islands. Tom Ferris, I know that you will discuss those matters with your colleagues across the UK, so perhaps you can say a little about how we are doing in comparison, given that the four nations all face the same post-Covid challenges.
11:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I will ask about the oral health improvement plan. I had some supplementary questions, but we covered quite a bit of ground in the first couple of questions.
The oral health improvement plan has been around for a number of years. We have talked about the payment reforms that have been made but it does not feel that those fit with what the plan envisaged, which was to move closer to a GP-type model. Are we getting to the point where we need a new plan to reflect how reality has moved on and is a bit different from what was envisaged back in 2018, when the plan was first brought in?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
In his initial question, Paul Sweeney asked about the immediate challenges and financial pressures that social care is facing. One big thing that has happened recently is the UK Government’s decision to raise employer national insurance contributions but not to exempt the social care sector. Will you talk a little bit about the impact of that decision?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
You mentioned costs of £21 million and £84 million. Those are annual costs, so they cannot be filled from reserves.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I want to ask about coercion—we almost just went to that area. Coercion is one of the big issues that even people who support the bill are concerned about. First, do you think that health professionals have the skills to identify whether coercion is happening? Secondly, is the model that is suggested in the bill the best way forward? Last week, witnesses suggested that a better, alternative system would be to use independent assessors—similar to those the Human Tissue Authority uses to ensure that coercion is not happening in relation to living donors—which would provide stronger safeguards. Is it necessary to have those stronger safeguards, or do you already have the skills in your team? Dr Provan, you almost went to that area.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
That is helpful. Fiona McIntyre, do you want to respond?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Although some of this area has been touched on under Gillian Mackay’s question at the very start, I want to ask about the requirement for self-administration. The member in charge is very clear in his explanatory notes that the policy intention is that patients accessing assisted dying would have to “self-administer the substance” used to end their life.
10:15However, there is some suggestion that perhaps the wording in the bill is less clear. Is the wording clear enough to meet the member in charge’s policy intent—and is that a good thing? Last week, we heard from colleagues in Australia, who were concerned about making sure that everyone had access to the new right; physician-assisted means were important to people who would not be in a position to take a substance themselves.
First, is the wording clear? Secondly, is there a concern over the human rights of people who might not be able to take a substance themselves to access that end-of-life choice?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Perhaps you would write to us on that. There is some suggestion that it may not be as clear as the member intended, so it would be useful to hear from you. It is in section 15(1).
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you.