Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1484 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

No, that is fine.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Let me clarify that. You are saying that, if the determination is that that pathway is suitable for someone, irrespective of everything else, they should get that treatment within three weeks and be in a rehab facility.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

That is helpful, because I think that some people would have assumed that they had a right to be in treatment within three weeks, because, in their minds, they were ready for it. Thanks for that clarification.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

To go back, I think that the bill talks about clinician-led decision making, but you suggested that the patient should be allowed to say, “I want this particular type of treatment.” Are you, indeed, suggesting that, uniquely, patients should be able to dictate their treatment path?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Obviously, budget decisions are normally made in the budget, and Mr Ross did not support the increase in that area this year.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

My questions cover costs and resources, but I think that you have covered most of that theme as we have gone through. We have talked about the Law Society in relation to the McCulloch case. In addition, the Law Society highlighted the potential risk of “significant litigation” arising from the bill. Might you take the opportunity to comment on that?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

The Law Society’s specific concern—which it suggested was about an “unintended consequence”—was that, if someone did not get the treatment and something then happened, their surviving relatives or partner could sue. Your financial memorandum does not include that litigation cost, but it is obvious that it could be significant.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

So, you have not included any cost for that.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

I am sorry, but I want to clarify that further. Someone for whom that is an agreed pathway should not expect to immediately—in three weeks’ time—be in a rehab facility, because all that other process would need to happen.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Tertiary Education and Training (Funding and Governance) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

I have some questions about private providers. We had some private providers giving evidence last week, and they are clearly not all the same.

The bill contains proposals for a process to approve private providers of further and higher education for the purposes of student support. Clearly, there is the potential for private provision to increase. In response to our call for views, we had some suggestions that there may be a lack of clarity in the checks and balances on those private providers that would be required in terms of student support. It would be good to hear your thoughts on that and anything in the bill you think should be changed to make it stronger.

Sarah, you have mentioned the issue a couple of times. You were polite in calling them independent.