The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1475 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I wonder whether you would be prepared to go further and suggest that the leadership teams of all public bodies should, if they have a relevant interest, particularly a financial interest, declare it? I do not think that it is unusual to find people in such positions who have an interest, because that is how they have gained the skills or whatever it was that made them valuable for that leadership post. Is this an opportunity to send out a signal to public bodies across Scotland that, if their leadership teams have any interests, it is in their interests to declare that and be clear and transparent?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
You made a point about the policy on what expenditure should be for. The lack of control in relation to that would be a public concern. Purchases may have been made on the credit cards that were not appropriate and that could not have been justified by the organisation, but nobody has been checking what was being spent. I will be mindful of language here, but the public might think that there would be a risk of fraud in the use of the cards. Is there any indication of that being the case, or do we just not know, because there are no controls?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
So, there was at least a second person looking at them. They were not just going through.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
I will pass back to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks, convener. Unlike the other members of the committee, I did not manage to join the visit, as I had another committee to attend. However, I know the hill. I am not a skier, so it is the other activities in the area that I have done; as Gordon Bulloch said, there are lots of other things to do, which do not require you to go to the very top.
My question is about the alternatives and what future planning there has been. You argue in your report that the 2021 master plan is not a master plan in the planning sense. It would be good for the committee to hear what you think is missing from it. What should be there, and what could make it a useful long-term planning document?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Just to be clear, would the long-term alternative to a funicular be chairlifts—which you can get skis, bikes and anything else on to—and not a gondola lift?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
No, I do not.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Preferably from the seas of Scotland.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
Professor Belch talked about LEZs. It is important that we do not miss the opportunity to hear evidence about the health benefits of LEZs. In Dundee, where Professor Belch and I both live, there is a relatively tight LEZ, but people still say that we should get rid of it because it is not going to have a benefit. It would be good to hear some of the evidence from Scotland and from further afield about why we should not only have LEZs but expand them.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Joe FitzPatrick
My question follows on from the discussion about food security. It is possible for us to eat less meat in order to have a healthier diet while ensuring that more of the meat that we buy comes from this country. That relates to the point that Brian Whittle made about the fact that meat that is produced in Scotland will have less of a carbon impact on the atmosphere than meat that has come from Australia. I am concerned about the arrangements that, in effect, allow massive amounts of lamb in particular to come all the way from the other side of the world, which cannot be good for the climate.
I want to ask about food sustainability more widely. When we are talking about meat, we are talking about protein. The fields around Dundee produce massive amounts of beans and peas. Most of the broad beans that are available in supermarkets come from the fields around Dundee. That is a source of protein that has a huge health benefit as well as an environmental benefit.
The other source of protein that we do not talk enough about but which we should talk about, in which Scotland is right at the top when it comes to production, is fish. We are encouraging people who eat meat to eat more fish, as it is really healthy.
I invite comments from the witnesses on that, starting with Jill Belch.