The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1329 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
That was still a good answer, though.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Bearing in mind that all three witnesses in today’s session have said that they fundamentally do not support the bill, they might not have much to say on this question, which is about the conscientious objection provision in the bill. What are your views on whether the bill is clear enough on that issue? Should it go further? Do you have any thoughts on institutional objections, where an organisation could say that it is not going to be part of the process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
It would be good to hear your thoughts on the section in the bill on conscientious objection. Is the section clear enough, and who do you think the provision applies to? Should the provision extend to organisations—potentially, such as your own—so that you are able to say, “As an organisation, we’re having nothing to do with this bill”? We have seen international examples of variation, particularly in Australia, in relation to institutions having a conscientious objection to the legislation. In that wide sense, I would like to hear your thoughts on conscientious objection and institutional objection.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Does anyone else want to come in?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Institutions that are opting out in Australia include hospices and care homes, many of which, in Australia, are run by religious organisations. In some states in Australia, organisations are able to opt out. The folk who live in those institutions and are under those organisations’ care would be unable to access the provisions in the legislation. Would any of you have concerns about that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
You both mentioned delayed discharges as being an area where IJBs have a particular role. There is huge variation in performance across the country, and it is clearly not all just about budget. I am particularly pleased with the performance in NHS Tayside. It is not perfect, but the three local authorities are managing to work together to tackle delayed discharges in a way that some other areas have been unable to do. How can good practice in one set of IJBs be passed on to other parts of the country?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I have some questions about integration authority budgets and, in particular, transparency. When we look at the Scottish Government website, the latest data that we find relates to 2022-23. Given that it is a really important area for delivery, is there anything that the Government can do to increase transparency and provide more up-to-date financial information on IJBs?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
The financial information on integration joint boards that is on the website is not recent—it relates to 2022-23. Is there anything that the Government can do to improve transparency around the spending of IJBs?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I feel that I should first declare that I, too, am old enough to remember when the John Major Government banned snus. There was quite a bit of television coverage at the time about the risks of that novel product potentially coming to the UK.
I want to ask about retail and sales. We have had comments from the retail industry, particularly from the Scottish Grocers Federation, about the practicality of complying with the regulations. The federation raised a concern about the age at which adult staff will be able to sell tobacco products, which is increasingly getting older and older. Might that actually provide a public health benefit? As it becomes more difficult for retailers to routinely supply tobacco products before they are completely gone, many will decide not to sell those products and we will find that tobacco is no longer universally available. Would that reduced availability make it easier for people to give up smoking, because they would not be surrounded by tobacco products in the way that they are now?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Cabinet secretary, you will be aware of the Audit Scotland report that suggested that there was a lack of a clear plan to deliver the Government’s vision. How does this budget fit in with that, and how does it help the Government to deliver its vision for the NHS in Scotland?