The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1365 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Rather than bring forward this bill, why did you not lodge an amendment to the Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill last year to say that it should include that additional spend?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
No, that is fine.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Let me clarify that. You are saying that, if the determination is that that pathway is suitable for someone, irrespective of everything else, they should get that treatment within three weeks and be in a rehab facility.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
That is helpful, because I think that some people would have assumed that they had a right to be in treatment within three weeks, because, in their minds, they were ready for it. Thanks for that clarification.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
To go back, I think that the bill talks about clinician-led decision making, but you suggested that the patient should be allowed to say, “I want this particular type of treatment.” Are you, indeed, suggesting that, uniquely, patients should be able to dictate their treatment path?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Obviously, budget decisions are normally made in the budget, and Mr Ross did not support the increase in that area this year.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
My questions cover costs and resources, but I think that you have covered most of that theme as we have gone through. We have talked about the Law Society in relation to the McCulloch case. In addition, the Law Society highlighted the potential risk of “significant litigation” arising from the bill. Might you take the opportunity to comment on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
The Law Society’s specific concern—which it suggested was about an “unintended consequence”—was that, if someone did not get the treatment and something then happened, their surviving relatives or partner could sue. Your financial memorandum does not include that litigation cost, but it is obvious that it could be significant.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
So, you have not included any cost for that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am sorry, but I want to clarify that further. Someone for whom that is an agreed pathway should not expect to immediately—in three weeks’ time—be in a rehab facility, because all that other process would need to happen.