The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1290 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
I invite the committee to agree to delegate to me and the clerks the publication of a short factual report on our deliberations on the affirmative Scottish statutory instrument that we have considered.
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Item 4 is consideration of a negative instrument. I refer members to paper 2. Do members have any comments on the Scottish Tribunals (Eligibility for Appointment) Amendment Regulations 2021?
As no member has indicated that they have any comments to make, are members content not to make any formal comments to the Parliament on the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Item 5 is continued evidence on PE1817, to end conversion therapy.
We will hear from faith groups that support the petition. Although we are hearing from four representatives, we have received a range of evidence from other faith groups, including representations from Jewish and Muslim communities. That evidence will all appear in our final report.
I welcome Rici Marshall Cross, clerk of the south Edinburgh local meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, Quakers in Scotland; Jayne Ozanne, director of the Ozanne Foundation and chair of the Ban Conversion Therapy coalition; the Rev Elder Maxwell Reay, member of the council of elders of Metropolitan Community Churches and national health service healthcare chaplain; and the Rev Fiona Bennett, minister of the Augustine United Church and moderator elect of the General Assembly of the United Reformed Church. You are all very welcome.
Members should refer to papers 3 and 4. I invite each of the witnesses to make a short opening statement, starting with Jayne Ozanne.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Would the Rev Fiona Bennett like to talk about that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Given that it was suggested earlier on that there might not be enough evidence, and that we needed to go away and do more research, it would be useful if we could pull together those references so that people can see the wider picture.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you.
I welcome back to the meeting Pam Duncan-Glancy MSP, who is supported by Kate Monahan, co-founder of Because We Matter; and Robert McGeachy, policy and engagement manager with Camphill Scotland. You are all very welcome. I refer members to papers 5 and 6. We also have correspondence from three organisations asking that the draft proposal be allowed to proceed to the next stage.
I invite Pam Duncan-Glancy to make a short opening statement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
That concludes our questions.
We are now required to make a decision on whether we are satisfied by the statement of reasons. I remind members that our decision should be based solely on whether we agree with the reasons that are set out in the statement as to why a further consultation on the proposal is not necessary. I am satisfied with the reasons that are set out, and I know that Fulton MacGregor is satisfied, too. Do members agree?
Members indicated agreement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Following on from the point that Jayne Ozanne, in particular, has touched on, I would say that, although the committee has taken a lot of powerful evidence, we are still keen to ensure that we are not missing anything. If there is a piece of evidence that any of the witnesses think that we should be aware of, they should flag that up to us.
Jayne Ozanne touched on the Cooper report—we should provide a link to the report to ensure that it is easily accessible to anyone who is following the committee’s work. Is there any other work that the Ozanne Foundation has done that you would want to flag up to the committee?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks. I do not think that there was a question there for Pam Duncan-Glancy, but I saw a smile come on her face as Fulton showed his cards.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Joe FitzPatrick
We are slightly over time, but I will let Maggie Chapman come in.