Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2573 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Bob Doris

I have no further questions. Having looked at the issue this morning, I welcome anything that the Scottish Government can do to improve the experience of those who face net earnings fluctuation and uncertainty. It is good to hear that such work is on-going.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Bob Doris

I have a brief question, cabinet secretary. Mr Balfour mentioned the Scottish Fiscal Commission, which gave evidence to the committee not long ago. I asked it what forecasting work it might do on suggested changes at UK level in relation to reserved benefits or, indeed, to benefits with a devolved aspect that would have Barnett consequentials if changes were made at UK level. The SFC said that it is very much tasked with forecasting with regard to the policy decisions of the Scottish Government.

However, you said earlier that the SFC also looks at what is happening across the UK and the potential impact on Scotland, although it looks only at what has been decided at a UK level, not at what has been mooted by the UK Government. Should the SFC’s role be expanded for the purposes of preparedness, if you like, so that, if the UK Government implements one of its mooted cuts to UK welfare benefits, whether reserved or devolved, the Scottish Government will have at its disposal relatively quickly facts, figures and statistics on what the impact on Scotland might be? That would help it to decide what actions and policy decisions it might take.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 6 March 2025

Bob Doris

That is helpful. Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

I will be ever so brief. In speaking in support of the affirmative instrument, I must commend Kevin Stewart and Douglas Lumsden for pushing for Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire to be part of the flat fares pilot. Their cases are almost as compelling as that for the north Glasgow and Maryhill Road corridor, where, with the fare capping that will be essential for my constituents, we could have excellent integration between buses and the rail network in that area, and we could work out the relationship between both. Notwithstanding that, though, I completely support the affirmative instrument that we are debating.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

SEPA is sometimes criticised. so I am trying to pay you a compliment by saying that there is clearly partnership working going on here. However, the nudge that I am looking for is for you to say whether you think that there could be more on the statute book to assist SEPA and other public agencies—I am not talking about the Promat site; I am talking more generally—to tackle the issue. The committee would be interested to hear about that. If there is nothing, that is okay and I will not ask any more questions. Is there anything specific that you would like to draw to our attention?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Regulation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

I do not want to get bogged down in the mechanisms, but any detail that Gary McIntyre can give on them would be helpful. I am conscious that, although the reimbursement is based on the single fare, most people will use a day ticket or tap on and tap off over the course of a week or a month, so the impact on the individual traveller might not seem that great. However, if the single ticket fare is inflated, the reimbursement kick-in could be significant. I am not saying that there is an issue; I am looking for reassurance that there is not one. Gary, would you like to comment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

The 5 per cent figure is helpful. I have learned from this exchange that there is not an assumption but that it is predicted that fares could go up by as much as 5 per cent and that that modelling work is taken into account for the statutory instrument for which you seek approval today. What would happen if fares went up beyond 5 per cent? How would that impact on the model? I apologise for going into this level of detail, but I am keen to know that.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

I have the reassurances that I need. The minister has nudged on to other areas, but I have no further questions.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 25 February 2025

Bob Doris

Minister, with the question that I will ask, I do not seek to undermine support for the scheme; I just want to make sure that we are getting the best value for money in relation to it.

My understanding is that the reimbursement rate, which is capped for older persons but not for younger persons, is based on a percentage of the average daily single ticket fare. Over the course of a year, bus companies will increase that fare, so the amount that is reimbursed to them will increase during the year. How is that taken into account—your officials might have the detail on this—in the modelling work to set the reimbursement rate and the cap in the first place? There could be an incentive for bus companies to price gouge—although I am not saying that they are doing that—in order to increase their overall take within the scheme over the course of an individual year.