Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 8 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2295 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Is it correct that the contract did not have within it a tolerance level and that it had to be on the nose?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

I will ask the question another way, as those just become numbers. All I want to know is that the ship is being delivered now—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

If that is the case, it would be within the specification in the original contract. We do not know that yet, but you will check on that this morning, is what you are saying to me.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

If a dead weight of 791 tonnes was within the permitted flexibility, it would have met the contract specifications as originally outlined, because built into that was a degree of flexibility. Is that correct?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Okay. I have no further questions. However, when we are having an exchange in the future, I urge you to make it meaningful to members of the public. For example, saying that there could be two less fully-laden articulated lorries on one of those vessels at another port, if it was deployed elsewhere, and that, in the context, that is pretty minimal would be helpful, because, with the numbers that are flying about, it looks as though this is way off course in terms of the dead weight. Again, it would be helpful to have something in writing that puts that in plain speech rather than doublespeak.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Oh, it is back to me again.

If we look at the small vessels replacement programme, there is around £185 million wrapped up in phase 1. Six bidders came forward for that, and I guess that those bids are currently being considered. We are keen to know how those bids will be assessed and the criteria that will be used. For example, what weight will be given to factors such as price—in other words, the reliability of what the overall cost will be to the public purse—and the quality of the bids. Quality is a very subjective word. I am keen to know a bit more about how a bid will become successful on the basis of price and quality and about other criteria that may lead to the final outcome of the contract—or contracts—being awarded.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Has that been done? I am told that you invited six to bid.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

That is really helpful. Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

So, you are comparing the quality of all six bids, but your belief is that all six bids will be of high quality. Then you have to determine what is best for the public purse.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission

Meeting date: 19 December 2024

Bob Doris

It might not matter in those terms, in relation to what you say about the aggregate position of the Scottish finances, but it certainly matters in our scrutiny role here, when we are trying to work out the long-term implications of UK decisions for policy decisions that the Scottish Government makes, as we are trying to do today.

Professor Roy articulated the position very well, but what I am trying to get at is that the winter fuel payment change was like a bolt out of the blue. It would not have been reasonable to have forecast what the risk was in relation to that, because most people did not expect the UK Government to do that. However, there is an expectation that there could be a squeeze on spend on disability payments in the UK.

Does the Scottish Fiscal Commission identify the risks of potential UK policy changes—because those are in the public domain and are being floated, if you like, proactively—then cost some of that and give it to the Scottish Government, or does the Scottish Government say, “Here are three things that have potential policy implications for Scotland—go and cost up our fiscal risk in relation to them”? Does any such proactive work happen, Professor Roy?