The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2122 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I want to look at the issue of resumption, which, according to my notes, is one of the bill’s more contested aspects. We will find out in this morning’s evidence taking.
Mr Hall, I think that I saw that you were the national president of the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, which thought that it was about time that compensation rights under resumption were reviewed. Perhaps, Mr Hall, you could say a little more about whether it is right in principle to review some of that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I will be incredibly brief, convener, because I was not intending to ask any questions this morning—I am just here to listen. However, I need to know more about your role as a regulator in general.
In many of your answers, you have effectively said, “These are the operational matters, and here is the fact of the matter in terms of operational matters”, and you have not strayed into policy matters. The deputy convener had quite an extensive exchange with you, and I think that members were trying to tease out how your operational experience informs Government as to how it might change its policy as a consequence of that. Members were trying to bring out some of that contrast, but I do not think that we have ever seen such a passive position from a regulator at committee.
I went and looked at the consultation responses in relation to the changed call-in procedures. A majority were in favour of the change, and a substantial minority were not in favour, so there was a finely balanced decision for Government to make. SEPA must surely have had a role in some of that, but I do not think that we are any the wiser as to what SEPA’s role was in relation to any of that.
More generally, in relation to these regulations, what has SEPA’s role been? After listening to this evidence session, I am completely unclear.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That would genuinely be helpful.
Mr Oates, you have been very patient. Do you have any comments or reflections on all of the above?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
And you are going to write to the committee with your thoughts on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Does that need to be clear on the face of the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Your view would be that if both parties could enter into a negotiation in good faith without having to have recourse to the tenant farming commissioner, that would be perfectly acceptable, but that it is a fall-back position.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
It might have been helpful to let you speak for longer, but this is really important, and I want to keep the questioning moving.
I want to ensure that I do not misrepresent you, Hamish. I think that you are suggesting that reviewing and changing the compensation for tenants on resumption could theoretically weaken the position of some tenants, which would be an unintended consequence in the legislation. I am not trying to summarise that as your entire position, but is that one of the aspects that you are perhaps hinting at in what you were saying?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
Should the bill deal with that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing. I was trying to find out a little bit more about fixed-term tenancies, because there were some things that my notes did not tell me. There are short limited-duration tenancies, which last for a maximum of five years. Those can be converted to limited-duration tenancies, which last for a minimum of five years and a maximum of 10 years. There are also modern limited-duration tenancies.
That made me wonder whether, from the 2003 act onwards, there has been no such thing as a short-term tenancy, because the tenancy could dribble on, by custom and practice or by arrangement, for 10, 15 or 20 years. If that is the situation, should we look again at whether waygo is fit for purpose? Should resumption be considered? Perhaps I am being a daft laddie, but I wonder whether that situation is a wee bit different.