The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2007 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
So, technically, if the bill goes through, the UK Government could repeal the provisions of the 1964 act, and there is a separate commencement power that would be exercised by the UK secretary of state to bring in the new fees regime that the Scottish Government would develop. The bill deals with those as two separate issues.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. I think that we are saying the same thing. The Scottish Government will have the power to bring in a new fee system, but the commencement of that will be in the hands of the UK secretary of state. Is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
If the secretary of state decides; I apologise—that is not how I wanted to express the question. Is it the case that the UK secretary of state requires to repeal the 1964 act before the new powers can come into place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
So we could be left with nothing—there could be a gap.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
Okay. I will not ask any more questions. I am minded to think that it would be easier if all the commencement powers were in the hands of the Scottish Government, but it would be helpful if the Cabinet Secretary for Transport could inform the committee whether any work has already been done in relation to what the new fees regime might look like and what the timescale might be, to see whether the possibility exists of there being a mismatch between a repeal of the existing regime and the new system coming into place.
Nick, do you have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Bob Doris
I know that I said that I had no further questions, but let us fast forward two years and assume that the Scottish Government wants to make a change. How long would it take a UK secretary of state to do their bit and get on with repealing the previous provisions? What is the timescale for that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Bob Doris
I will be brief, convener.
Good morning, minister. I was pleased to hear that you are keen to look at the cost of the school day, which was the question that Marie McNair was exploring. When women leave a household, they do not always leave with all their belongings and clothes, and they may have children.
I do not expect you to say yes to this today, but in relation to the cost of the school day, I note that school clothing grants are issued once a year. Could there be circumstances in which a bit of flexibility could be considered in relation to an additional application for a school clothing grant where a woman is fleeing domestic and economic abuse from a perpetrator? I am just asking for consideration of that suggestion, rather than saying that we should do it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Bob Doris
Before I move on to the next theme, I will ask a little more about Jeremy Balfour’s line of questioning. Something that has come up consistently during our evidence taking is that women need a pathway to leave. Victims and survivors might leave because of a crisis, but they sometimes know for a long time that they need to leave, before they take the final step of leaving an abusive relationship.
Mr Balfour said that the five-week wait for the first universal credit payment is a major challenge. Women cannot apply for universal credit in confidence and have certainty that an award will be issued seamlessly. Community care grants and crisis grants can take domestic abuse into account, and we have heard about the fund to leave. Should consideration be given to cross-Government working, and to work between the DWP and the Scottish Government, to give financial certainty to a woman who decides that she must leave an abusive relationship? Should a package of measures be put in place before a woman, often with children, has to flee an abusive relationship? Real partnership working could mean the end of the five-week wait and could also change some of the criteria for Scottish Government grants. Could you work with Shirley-Anne Somerville to take that piece of work forward across Government and could you encourage work between the Scottish and UK Governments on that pathway to leave?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Bob Doris
I am very aware—again because I represent a Glasgow constituency—that Glasgow City Council sees some of those issues at first hand, as new Scots who want to get their leave to remain status to stay in the country have very quickly become homeless and have gone into that system.
Glasgow City Council and Paul McLennan, as housing minister, made representations to the UK Home Office, which seems to be shirking its duty and responsibility to ensure that proper support is in place. They made those representations from a housing perspective, but you are the Minister for Equalities, so have you added your weight to those calls?