The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2043 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Can you say a bit more about when that has happened in the past?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
That is good to hear, and that is not lost on me. I had supplementary questions because we just had numbers flying about, which became meaningless to me, quite frankly.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
What is the ITT? As it is the first time you have used the term, could you—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
That is context, because, although we may not have known the acronyms, we kind of knew the amount. It is more about how price, quality and other criteria are considered once those bids are finalised and put in for consideration.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I will be careful with my next question on quality, because every bidder must be dealt with consistently and equitably as part of the process.
In relation to quality, a bid on paper can be very different from what is delivered in the shipyard. In relation to the demand to build, is phase 1 of the small vessels programme more straightforward, given the other questions that we have been asking about other ships under contract? Does the track record of individual shipyards in delivering such vessels in the past come into play when determining who wins an award? Also, how can you compare the bidders when two of the bidders have never bid for work with you guys before—so they are new entrants from your point of view—while the other four bidders have an on-going relationship with you?
How do you balance the quality on paper with what the quality will be on delivery? Anyone can put on paper that the vessel or vessels will be good quality, but it is delivery that counts, within the cost envelope. How do you disaggregate that when determining quality?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 January 2025
Bob Doris
I just want to check something. Clause 5(3) of the bill says:
“The Secretary of State must lay a copy of the statement, and of any revised or replacement statement, before Parliament.”
That got me thinking about whether we could get agreement from the UK Government about the current set of strategic priorities. The Scottish Government has to agree to those priorities as they relate to devolved matters. However, the deputy convener talked about an evolving situation. In 18 months’ time, or in two or three years’ time, the UK Government may reset its strategic priorities. Is it the Scottish Government’s position that this is not a one-off consenting process for strategic priorities but that, under clause 5, it is an on-going process?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Bob Doris
So, it could be a joint space.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Bob Doris
Do not worry—I will not be soliciting you to consider any further remit for the SFC in my next question.
It would be helpful to get some information on the record from you. The committee will have to return to scrutinising the Scottish Government’s efforts to mitigate the two-child cap. We do not underestimate the challenge for you in ensuring that you have all the relevant information to project what the costs of that might be—not just in the short term but in the longer term. I will not list off potential factors from my notes, but it would be helpful if Professor Roy could say what those various factors and any related challenges might be. That would give us a steer for future scrutiny of the matter.
10:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 19 December 2024
Bob Doris
I do not want to ask too much more, given that a lot more information will be put into the public domain on 7 January, which is not very far away. However, I saw in my notes that there could be a potential implication in relation to the benefits cap. The Scottish Government mitigates the UK benefits cap in some respects—in relation to discretionary housing payments, for example—and it tries to avoid clawback on that. Is that another cost factor that might have to be taken into account? If the DWP claws money back because of that mitigation, that would have to be projected into the overall cost for us, which could be even higher.