Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2043 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Great British Energy Bill

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

CEOs come and go, and what is left is what is in statute—and that is what we have to scrutinise. I would be keen to see the word “consent” in clause 6 as well. I would also be keen to see how the approach will be reviewed in the future in relation to whether the powers that are passed to the UK Government on an operational basis do what it says on the tin and give us the outcomes that we want. It is important for the committee to get a balanced view on the passing of the powers, or on recommending that the powers be passed via an LCM to the UK Government.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Great British Energy Bill

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

So, you have on-going discussions on clause 6.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Great British Energy Bill

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

I do not doubt the good will on both sides. However, you talked about future proofing. The strategic priorities are set out at a very high level, and then they will become regionalised, localised and sector specific. They will be realised and have practical implications on the ground across a range of devolved areas—in a positive way, I hope. Agreement to high-level strategic priorities may become detached from the decision making and what happens on the ground. What confidence do you have that the Scottish Government will remain an equal partner in the process, when agreement has been sought and secured from it in relation to the high-level strategic priorities?

That brings us back to clause 6, which talks about directions to GB Energy. In the future, the Scottish Government may think that those directions are at odds with the high-level priorities that it has signed up to. Will you seek to give consent to, or to be consulted on, any directions that are given to GB Energy or its partners under clause 6?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Great British Energy Bill

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Does “consent” relate to clause 5 but not to clause 6?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Is it correct that the contract did not have within it a tolerance level and that it had to be on the nose?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

I will ask the question another way, as those just become numbers. All I want to know is that the ship is being delivered now—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

If that is the case, it would be within the specification in the original contract. We do not know that yet, but you will check on that this morning, is what you are saying to me.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

If a dead weight of 791 tonnes was within the permitted flexibility, it would have met the contract specifications as originally outlined, because built into that was a degree of flexibility. Is that correct?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Okay. I have no further questions. However, when we are having an exchange in the future, I urge you to make it meaningful to members of the public. For example, saying that there could be two less fully-laden articulated lorries on one of those vessels at another port, if it was deployed elsewhere, and that, in the context, that is pretty minimal would be helpful, because, with the numbers that are flying about, it looks as though this is way off course in terms of the dead weight. Again, it would be helpful to have something in writing that puts that in plain speech rather than doublespeak.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Ferry Services

Meeting date: 7 January 2025

Bob Doris

Oh, it is back to me again.

If we look at the small vessels replacement programme, there is around £185 million wrapped up in phase 1. Six bidders came forward for that, and I guess that those bids are currently being considered. We are keen to know how those bids will be assessed and the criteria that will be used. For example, what weight will be given to factors such as price—in other words, the reliability of what the overall cost will be to the public purse—and the quality of the bids. Quality is a very subjective word. I am keen to know a bit more about how a bid will become successful on the basis of price and quality and about other criteria that may lead to the final outcome of the contract—or contracts—being awarded.