The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2565 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you. I am not sure whether the Scottish Youth Parliament has a view on whether a commissioner would be value for money, so perhaps I will word the question slightly differently. Does the Youth Parliament have any clarity on whether there should be a commissioner or on other ways in which we can enforce some of the obligations that will come into law, should the bill be passed?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Jeremy Balfour has a follow-up question on this. Jeremy, your question might well be the same as the one that I was about to ask—who knows? Depending on what you ask, I might come in afterwards, too.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
It is also a very good answer, Skye, which is why I pushed for answers to the question. We on the committee are still forming our views; just because we ask a question in a certain way, that does not mean that that is our underlying view. We are trying to form our views as we take evidence on the legislation, so that was a perfectly acceptable answer.
I will suspend the meeting for another five minutes or so, if that would be helpful.
10:18 Meeting suspended.Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Politicians avoid answering questions all the time, Frances, so I am not criticising you for not coming down on one side or another, but—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful. Skye Allan mentioned that the Scottish Youth Parliament has not looked, in particular, at other ways in which the policy outcomes could be secured without legislation. Skye or Kristers Lukins may wish to comment on whether the national performance framework could be used to see what the Scottish Parliament wants to happen in relation to this work. It is an opportunity for either of you to add something at this point, if you wish to do so.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you. I did not want to take you off on a tangent, so I am sorry for that. I just wanted to give you an opportunity to clarify what you meant.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you very much, Skye. Do you want to comment, Kristers?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
It would make sense if we stopped now and had a comfort break. Then we can get on with the next line of questioning.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
It is worth noting that there are some specific questions that we want to ask the Scottish Youth Parliament, because I know that you have done some particular work with your members in relation to this issue. It is a courtesy to ask you to come in for each question, and you do not have to answer each one. It is also perfectly acceptable to say, “No, that is okay—we will wait for the next one.” However, that was a helpful answer, Skye, so thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you, Kristers. I note that every organisation on the panel believes that policy coherence is important. I suspect that the Scottish Government does, too. The question that we are asking today is whether policy coherence requires legislation. The Scottish Government initially chose to introduce legislation, but then it decided not to and instead to support Sarah Boyack’s bill. It has now decided that legislation might not be required to get the policy coherence that we all want. This is a long question that might bring only a short answer, but is legislation required to bring policy coherence?
09:15