The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2641 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2026
Bob Doris
If not, that is okay.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Bob Doris
:Can I just come in there, Emma? We have already discussed negative emissions technologies and peatland restoration as part of that pathway. What I am trying to explore is whether the Scottish Government’s rationale jars with you—in other words, given that this is its own political choice, whether you are fine with that and the alternative pathways are valid.
The one aspect that the committee has not really discussed is reforesting and tree planting—and I apologise for cutting across you earlier, but I just wanted to ensure that there was time to ask this question. My understanding is that the Scottish Government is front loading much of its tree planting, and that what is in this first climate change plan is actually ahead of what the Climate Change Committee has recommended. I guess that that will be welcome, but I just wonder whether you can confirm that.
However, in the work that the Government has carried out under what is called the CARBINE model, the benefits of reforesting are more stated, and the Government thinks that that modelling is more informed and that—and I say this with total respect, Emma, because I have no idea which I should opt for—the Climate Change Committee’s model is based on more limited knowledge and, therefore, is less accurate. Some comments on that would, I think, be quite helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Bob Doris
I will ask a question for clarity, in the hope that we can quickly move on to more substantive issues. I want to check that I am accurate in understanding that it would not be appropriate for the Scottish Government to instruct the Climate Change Committee to give a briefing to a committee of this Parliament, due to the independent nature of the Climate Change Committee. Please correct me if I have that wrong, but I understand that to be the situation.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Bob Doris
:I am sure that we can make that happen.
I will ask a few brief questions on agriculture, and in particular on the Scottish Government not taking the pathway advice in relation to production and livestock. Some of the narrative around that from the Scottish Government has been that reducing livestock to grow crops may not be best for Scotland’s geography. I am sure that there other reasons as well, but the Scottish Government did not take that option.
Emma Pinchbeck, could we have some brief reflections on the Scottish Government rationale for that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Bob Doris
:Those points are well made.
I will make this my final question, convener—I will not come back in, because of time constraints. It was important to put all of that on the record, Emma, and it will be helpful to the committee, but I would just note that the Scottish Government’s target for tree planting over the lifetime of the plan as laid out does not go beyond what the Climate Change Committee has suggested. The difference is that the modelling that it is using to assert the benefit of tree planting is, it says, more accurate and more informed than—and, again, I say this respectfully—the information available to the Climate Change Committee. The quantum of trees being planted is no greater, despite its being an alternative pathway. Will the Climate Change Committee, at any point, take a view on the Scottish Government’s modelling work? I suppose that that is the substantive question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Bob Doris
:That was helpful—thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Bob Doris
When will the Government next review its options for uprating? The reason I ask is that, as I see from the briefing, the Scottish Commission on Social Security noted that analysis was last done on uprating options in 2024 and said that they should be reviewed again in due course. What do you take “in due course” to mean?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Bob Doris
Should they take place?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Bob Doris
I have a brief thought. I note that, in 2025-26, £12.1 million was paid out in funeral support payments. I want to talk about whether that is a sufficient amount to fund the value of the services. I am sure that we will look at that in a moment, but that is still a lot of money in the system. If only a small number of funeral directors are being hit by this issue—albeit disproportionately—could any sharing of risk be achieved in the system? Some funeral directors are doing okay out of the system, but others are not. If those who are willing to take on people on low incomes or on benefits accept a higher risk, a risk share arrangement between funeral directors might be a way in which some of the smaller providers could step forward as the only funeral service in their local area. They would know that, if they were let down for whatever reason, they would have the heft of the sector behind them. Have any discussions like that taken place?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2026
Bob Doris
So, rather than reviewing the uprating options at a set time in the future, the approach would be to review them when required, based on events and circumstances.