Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 5 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2272 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

I have no reason to believe that the scheme administrator will not do a very good job. However, fast-forwarding a few years, if we find that the Scottish voice is not being heard by the UK scheme administrator, what power is there for on-going discussion between the Scottish Government and the scheme administrator about tweaking things to ensure that the unique positions of remote and rural communities, island communities or local authorities are being heard at UK level?

11:15  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

It is helpful to be reminded of that.

I think that we have already heard the answer to my final question, but we can put it on the record again. Can you summarise any significant changes that have been made to the role of the scheme administrator compared with what it would have looked like under the previous Scottish system? I am not talking about glass. I am talking about other matters. For example, how will fees work for small producers? Has that changed under the new dovetailing scheme? Has the process for setting deposit levels changed? What are the differences?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

To allow the new fees to come into place.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

Okay.

I have one final question. Let us say that the process goes swimmingly well, the new fee regime is developed and the UK secretary of state says what they will do. If, at some point in the future, the Scottish ministers wish to lay further regulations to change how fees for ports are developed or to change what the fee regime looks like, will there be any recourse to the UK secretary of state or will the matter be fully in the hands of the Scottish ministers?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

So the only issue that we are talking about is whether there could be a gap.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

So, technically, if the bill goes through, the UK Government could repeal the provisions of the 1964 act, and there is a separate commencement power that would be exercised by the UK secretary of state to bring in the new fees regime that the Scottish Government would develop. The bill deals with those as two separate issues.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

Okay. I think that we are saying the same thing. The Scottish Government will have the power to bring in a new fee system, but the commencement of that will be in the hands of the UK secretary of state. Is that correct?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Meeting date: 27 May 2025

Bob Doris

If the secretary of state decides; I apologise—that is not how I wanted to express the question. Is it the case that the UK secretary of state requires to repeal the 1964 act before the new powers can come into place?