The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2048 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
I turn to Lyndsay Clelland. Do you have any suggestions for how we can improve the system in relation to Social Security Scotland or our local authorities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
For clarity, I agree with you, but I am thinking about the art of the achievable with regard to the recommendations that the committee may make.
I turn to the other witnesses. It is fine if you want to add anything about the UK system, but I want to ask you about the Scottish system. What improvements need to be made? I am thinking in particular about crisis grants and community care grants. Although there is no specific directive, by and large someone will have to demonstrate that they are without an income or are on a low income before they can access those grants. Of course, someone who is in an economically abusive relationship cannot always provide evidence for that, or they may not even be aware that they are in that situation. Changing the criteria for the Scottish welfare fund may be one way of improving the system in Scotland.
What works well, and what could be improved in relation to Social Security Scotland or our local authorities?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
As my colleague Paul O’Kane alluded to, the Housing (Scotland) Bill is going through the Scottish Parliament. It has often been said that we know what we need to do on the ground and that we could do some of that now. One of the reasons that we were keen to have both of you as witnesses is to comment on that. What could we do on the ground to help prevent homelessness for abuse victims and survivors? I will turn to Viki Fox first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
Moving on, I want to look specifically at the UK and Scottish benefits systems; perhaps we could deal with them a wee bit separately.
I do not want to put words in the witnesses’ mouths, but as well as looking at the way in which the UK system works, can you tell us what you think works well? It would also be helpful to have any clear points that you think need to change to better support victim/survivors when they wish to leave economic abuse?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Lyndsay, would you like to add anything to that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you for those specific examples—they are helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Bob Doris
Thank you both. That was very helpful.
I have no further questions, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Bob Doris
Liam, can you assist us? I apologise if this is in our briefing paper for today and I have missed it but, in the past, we have had data on performance from the Scottish Parliament information centre. For example, we were told that 60 per cent of trains were cancelled because of an engineering issue, which would sit with Network Rail, and that 40 per cent of issues were because of something else. I apologise that I do not have that information, but can you assist me, Mr Sumpter?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Bob Doris
I want to put something on the record, given Mr Cameron’s comment about the SPT ZoneCard scheme. The recent revisions to the scheme and the redrawing of the boundaries had a devastating impact on many of my constituents, and they will no longer be using the ZoneCard because of that. I took up the issue with SPT and, although I will not explore the issue in this meeting, I know that any of my constituents who are watching us today would want me to put on the record the absolutely devastating impact on them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 April 2025
Bob Doris
You said that you are disappointed about the changes in relation to the bus partnership fund. Has the removal of that fund and its replacement with a fund that is diminished in value and which is not multiyear prevented you from undertaking strategic thinking or has it simply delayed strategic action? Those are two different things. Is strategic thinking still being undertaken? Is it simply the case that you cannot act on the ground until you are clear about what the budget lines look like?