The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2552 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
I absolutely would, Mr Wallace. The idea is to flex the workforce, so that it can expand and contract without taking on long-term or permanent full-time equivalent staff who are not required. It is the organisation’s job to be fleet of foot and innovative in that regard. I am sure that future committees will want to scrutinise that in more detail.
I will stick with the adult disability payment. Our SPICe briefing notes that the authorisation rate has dropped from 50 per cent in 2023 to 35 per cent in summer 2025. I have no idea why that is the case. Why is it the case?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
I am content with that answer, Mr Wallace. An efficient organisation is not always the same as an organisation that makes financial savings. If you run an efficient organisation, it costs what it costs. I totally accept that as an answer.
My final question is about the completion of case transfer. Does that free up resource? If so, how does that get directed? Does it feed back into processing times and call waiting times? Can you say a bit about that? I have had more than a fair share of time, so I ask for a brief answer so that we can put something on the record, please.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
Good morning, everyone. I will focus a wee bit on processing times for applications and call waiting times. I will pick on adult disability payments, because they have been the most challenging within the organisation. It would appear from the figures that I am looking at that call waiting times and processing times are nudging up again. I know that you will tell me that they are still much lower in comparison with the peak, when things were not going so well, but they are nudging up again. Can you explain to me why they are starting to nudge up again?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
I appreciate that answer. I do not think that you want to be drawn into a discussion about mean, mode and median—I feel like I am back at school—but, obviously, at different times of the year, there will be waits that are average and waits that are longer. Putting all that to one side for a moment, I imagine that the organisation plans for surge demand. You used the word “seasonal”. Is there a surge demand strategy? I am not asking you to give it to me in detail this morning, but I would like an assurance that there is a strategy. If so, does it need to be reviewed? A surge demand strategy should mean that you can cope without waiting times going up.
I will roll that into my next question. My understanding is that everything is linked, because the same person who is answering the phones is dealing with casework. If someone spends more time answering phones, processing times may go up because they will also deal with cases. I seek some reassurance that the organisation is dealing with surge demand as work in progress and that it can flex during times of seasonal demand, rather than committee members such as myself asking why demand is going up.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Bob Doris
I accept all that. I do not want to sound curmudgeonly, but I am not asking you to speculate; I am asking you to analyse and understand the figures and then take appropriate steps in the organisation. Thirty-five per cent is perhaps the right rate, but if it is not, we need to address what is going on in the system. We are at the tail-end of this parliamentary session, but a future committee will want to better understand those numbers, not quite in real time but in a structured way.
You told the Finance and Public Administration Committee in June that you were satisfied with the quality of ADP reviews. The SPICe briefing says that 5 per cent of the cases that are reviewed lead to a lower award or to no award, compared with 13 per cent for the DWP’s PIP. ADP appears to be more favourable in that respect, but does that mean that there is little scope for financial savings in that area? In other words, is that as lean as it can possibly be, or can we do better?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Bob Doris
I suppose that I mean guidance for everyone, but I will leave that to the minister and his team. I am asking what the thoughts are currently on guidance.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Bob Doris
Will there be associated guidance, or will the code stand alone?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Bob Doris
Minister, you talked about bringing the code back to the committee. I am content today to give the Scottish Government the power, via Transport Scotland, to withdraw that entitlement to travel—in certain circumstances, where that power is contextualised and appropriate. What we are debating today is the process around how that power will be used and how it will be proportionate. You mentioned bringing the code back to the committee. Would the committee have a further vote on whether to approve that code or otherwise? That might determine how I view today’s evidence session.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Bob Doris
If there is time, I might come back in later, but I think that I have had a fair crack of the whip for the moment.