The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2194 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In evidence, we have received a range of detailed drafting suggestions for the bill. Do you have any comments on any of the suggestions that have been made by members of the legal profession and others who have been in touch with the committee?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Minister, what are your thoughts on the argument that the Scottish Government should carry out an awareness raising campaign on the impact of the bill? If the Government is minded to do so, what form would a campaign take?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring in Jeremy Balfour, I have a couple of questions along this line of questioning. Bill Kidd asked a couple of questions on this, but, whatever process is in the bill—and regardless of whether any amendments go forward—surely it should be clear to any party involved in a lease exactly what the implications will be for them. They should understand what the notice period would be and what the process is for ending a lease. The point that there needs to be a clear narrative and a clear set of rules has come across in the evidence that we have heard, irrespective of evidence on various other things.
You could also argue that there should be a consistent approach. The rigid approach, as proposed in the bill, could work well. However, business is not always as rigid as the rules that are set out. Having a bit of flexibility could be beneficial, as long as everyone understands exactly where they are.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government has advised that it will take action to address the points raised in questions 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
The committee also asked the Scottish Government questions about the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering one instrument, on which an issue has been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument amends the Environmental Regulation (Enforcement Measures) (Scotland) Order 2015—the principal order—to include offences under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024 as relevant offences. That would enable the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to use civil sanctions in respect of those offences.
In relation to the instrument, the committee asked the Scottish Government about an apparent error in a reference to the principal order. The reference had also not been footnoted. The full detail of the correspondence is set out in the committee papers published for this meeting.
The Scottish Government confirmed the typographical error and that the correct footnote had been misplaced, and that it intends to correct those errors in the signing version of the instrument, assuming that the instrument is approved by the Scottish Parliament.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in respect of those errors?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In so doing, does the committee wish to make clear that it is not expressing a view on the proposed method of correction?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Issues have also been raised on the following two linked instruments.