Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 16 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2194 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

In evidence, we have received a range of detailed drafting suggestions for the bill. Do you have any comments on any of the suggestions that have been made by members of the legal profession and others who have been in touch with the committee?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Minister, what are your thoughts on the argument that the Scottish Government should carry out an awareness raising campaign on the impact of the bill? If the Government is minded to do so, what form would a campaign take?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Before I bring in Jeremy Balfour, I have a couple of questions along this line of questioning. Bill Kidd asked a couple of questions on this, but, whatever process is in the bill—and regardless of whether any amendments go forward—surely it should be clear to any party involved in a lease exactly what the implications will be for them. They should understand what the notice period would be and what the process is for ending a lease. The point that there needs to be a clear narrative and a clear set of rules has come across in the evidence that we have heard, irrespective of evidence on various other things.

You could also argue that there should be a consistent approach. The rigid approach, as proposed in the bill, could work well. However, business is not always as rigid as the rules that are set out. Having a bit of flexibility could be beneficial, as long as everyone understands exactly where they are.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Does the committee wish to note that the Scottish Government has advised that it will take action to address the points raised in questions 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

The committee also asked the Scottish Government questions about the following instrument.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instrument subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 3, we are considering one instrument, on which an issue has been raised.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments not subject to Parliamentary Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Is the committee content with the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

The instrument amends the Environmental Regulation (Enforcement Measures) (Scotland) Order 2015—the principal order—to include offences under the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024 as relevant offences. That would enable the Scottish Environment Protection Agency to use civil sanctions in respect of those offences.

In relation to the instrument, the committee asked the Scottish Government about an apparent error in a reference to the principal order. The reference had also not been footnoted. The full detail of the correspondence is set out in the committee papers published for this meeting.

The Scottish Government confirmed the typographical error and that the correct footnote had been misplaced, and that it intends to correct those errors in the signing version of the instrument, assuming that the instrument is approved by the Scottish Parliament.

Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in respect of those errors?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

In so doing, does the committee wish to make clear that it is not expressing a view on the proposed method of correction?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Issues have also been raised on the following two linked instruments.