The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2246 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Before I bring Oliver Mundell back in, I note that you gave the example of HMRC. Are there any other departments with which there have been challenges and delays in getting information?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
In response to the committee’s call for views, the Faculty of Procurators of Caithness said:
“There should be a specific provision for an interested party to raise concerns about the Judicial Factors administration of the estate.”
It proposed that
“in the first instance this should be with the Accountant of Court”
and that if the interested person or organisation were unsatisfied with the outcome, there would then be a role for the court. When the Scottish Law Commission appeared before the committee last week, it was decidedly unsure about the policy merits of that idea. What do witnesses think of that proposal? Can you identify any benefits of or drawbacks to that suggestion?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Before we move on, is it common for judicial factories to be cross-border, both within the UK and further afield? Have you come across that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Will the bill aid the work that you do if there are cross-border issues? I know that that is a difficult question.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
For our second panel today, I welcome Morna Grandison, director of interventions, Law Society of Scotland; Sandy Lamb, partner, Lindsays; and Ken Pattullo, partner, Begbies Traynor.
I remind the panellists not to worry about turning on the microphones, as they will be turned on automatically. If you would like to come in on any questions, please raise your hand or catch the eye of the clerks. There is no need to answer every question—you can simply indicate that it is not for you. However, if you want to follow up in writing afterwards, please do so.
Before we move to questions from the committee, I want, first of all, to thank you for agreeing to appear before us today. It is helpful for the committee to get the views of those practising as judicial factors.
For the benefit of the committee, can you describe the type or types of judicial factories that you are currently, and have been, involved in? Specifically, what are the general purposes of your appointment? For how long have you been, and do you usually find yourself, in post? How did you initially come to be appointed as a judicial factor by the court?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Morna Grandison, do you have anything to add?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We move on to a question that is really for Morna. The witnesses will be aware of the situation with McClure Solicitors, which ceased trading in 2021, when Jones Whyte was appointed to take over a substantial volume of case work on trusts, executories and powers of attorney. If the McClure case had been suitable for the appointment of a judicial factor, the committee is interested to know how that would have operated in practice, given the scale and nature of the case load that McClure Solicitors had. To give you some indication of that, it was estimated that there were more than 60,000 wills, 20,000 powers of attorney and about 18,500 trusts.
Who would have assumed responsibility for the on-going work required for existing cases in areas such as trusts and executories when it is presumably challenging for an in-house judicial factor to have expertise in all the specialist areas of legal practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Would it be quite common to divide up the existing business to regulated firms?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 4 is consideration of two instruments that are subject to negative procedure. No points have been raised on the instruments. Is the committee content with the instruments?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 13th meeting in 2024 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to please switch off or silence their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
Under agenda item 1, is the committee content to take items 5, 6 and 7 in private?
Members indicated agreement.