The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2416 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
As there are no further questions, I thank the witnesses for their helpful and insightful evidence. The committee might follow up some issues in writing in due course. That concludes the public part of the meeting.
11:47 Meeting continued in private until 11:52.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Yes, thank you. We may be in touch with you with some further questions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
I will come back to Dr Patrick for a moment. You touched on the Law Society’s submission and used the word “incremental”. Does the Law Society consider that, if the bill in front of us deals only with certain remedies for breach of contract, it could lead to fragmentation and legal uncertainty?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
The bill is quite limited in scope, as we discussed with the previous panel. Your written submissions are quite clear about what you think about that, but it would be useful to get on the public record your thoughts and views with regard to the limits of the bill. Should the bill be broader, or should a different approach taken with regard to wider contract law?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Professor Brown.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Do you have a view on the arguments that Dr Jonathan Brown of the University of Strathclyde made in response to our call for views that the existing common law on contract does not need any reform or that any reform should have a wider ambit, taking into account other aspects of Scots private law?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Professor Bogle.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 5 is evidence taking from two panels of witnesses on the Contract (Formation and Remedies) (Scotland) Bill. I welcome the members of our first panel, who are from the Scottish Law Commission: Lady Ann Paton, chair; Professor Hector MacQueen, former lead commissioner; and Rachel Rayner, chief executive.
There is no need to worry about the microphones, which will be dealt with for you. If you would like to respond to a question, please raise your hand. There is no need to answer every question; you can simply indicate if you do not wish to respond. However, after the meeting, please feel free to follow up in writing on any question, if you wish to do so.
I am happy to hand over to Lady Paton to make some opening remarks.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
The committee certainly enjoys doing this type of work. It is a welcome change from the secondary legislation that we usually look at.
I hand over to Roz McCall.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Stuart McMillan
Until we had some type of written or formalised constitution, these things would have to be looked at on an issue-by-issue basis. We also have this Parliament, and it would be up to the politicians of the day to agree, or not, that a referendum should, or should not, take place on any issues going forward.
It is common knowledge that some colleagues across the chamber voted for the bill at stage 1 but were quite clear about reserving their right to offer support later in the process, depending on amendments at stages 2 and 3. I genuinely feel that, if a referendum were to take place, that would be a genuine reflection of a citizens assembly.
I have noted the Scottish Government’s consideration of what such a question would be in the documentation on the committee’s web page, but I do not, for one minute, believe that concerns about whether the question would be fair or unfair are realistic. I would make one suggestion, which is this: “Do you support the provisions in the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, as passed in the Scottish Parliament on whatever date? Yes or no?” That is not a leading question. Obviously, other suggestions would be available.
As for timescales, if the bill were to pass, that would happen at some point early in 2026, so no referendum could take place before the Scottish elections. I think that having a referendum of any type within the first two and a half years of the next parliamentary session would be a logical timescale, but if it were to happen in the early part of that two-and-a-half-year period, that would be fine, too. I am very relaxed about that, as long as it happened within that period of time.
I am happy to end there, convener.