The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2194 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering eight instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 18th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on taking business in private. Is the committee content to take items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also, have you taken on any additional staff to deal with the FOI requests?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
More generally.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Building a commercial ship is different from building a naval ship—that comment is continually heard. I have not yet had the opportunity to meet the new chief executive, but I know that that is being worked on.
I am asking these questions because the FMI reports are very clear about some of the challenges. One of the reports says that new cost forecasting processes appear to be adequate and an improvement on previous systems, but that that is clearly reliant on there being accurate drawings, design and engineering information.
There will be some questions about the Glen Rosa and the announcement that has been made in the past couple of weeks. However, as the report highlights, there are still challenges. That is not helpful, to say the least. It is not helpful in terms of the yard’s future. Notwithstanding the strengthening of the board, that raises questions about the strength of the board beforehand. I am not casting aspersions on any individual, but, with regard to the board as an entity, it shows a complete lack of leadership at board level to scrutinise what is actually taking place on the shop floor and what is happening with regard to the management of the yard. I genuinely have concerns about that, because the fact is that it has just lost two orders.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In all fairness to the shop stewards, they have been asking to have an input for some time. It should not take a meeting that I organised with the Deputy First Minister and two shop stewards to get that point raised yet again, when the shop stewards have been raising those points directly to the chair of the board and the organisation. Fundamentally, the shop stewards want the yard to survive and to thrive. If there is going to be better engagement, I welcome that, and I am sure that that would also be welcomed on the shop floor. However, it should not take that type of action for that to happen.
The committee recently received correspondence from the permanent secretary to the Scottish Government, which said:
“The Directors of FMPG have raised concerns about their ability to operate in a fully commercial manner, taking account of their responsibilities and liabilities as Directors under the Companies Act, alongside constraints on their commercial decisions by virtue of compliance with Scottish Government guidance such as the Scottish Public Finance Manual”.
When I read that, my first thought—notwithstanding the legal aspect that directors clearly have to operate under, which I would not argue with at all—was that that looks as though the directors are passing the buck, because they have not undertaken their duties in the way that they should have. Do you agree?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
I am sorry, but—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
I am sorry for interrupting, but they are allowed in for only 15 minutes at a time.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful, and it would be good if you could provide that information, Mr Rhatigan.
On Ferguson Marine Port Glasgow, Mr Irwin, you touched on the reports that First Marine International sent to the committee. There were six different reports and the covering letter accompanying them states that the first study, which took place in 2020-21, was, in effect, about the benchmarking, and the second study, which took place in 2022-23, was the potential improvements study.
Between those two reports and the level of scrutiny that the division, with that information, has placed on the yard—obviously, you have the unredacted versions as compared to us—and bearing in mind how politically sensitive the situation with FMPG is and how many jobs are involved with the yard, what genuine activity has your division undertaken and what input does it have with regard to the yard?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is quite helpful information.
How does SCAD assess the effectiveness of previous decisions to intervene, or not, in a particular business or to make follow-on investments such as the recent investment of £14.2 million in Ferguson’s?