The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2194 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
The purpose of this instrument is to change employee contribution rates by amending the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Regulations 2015 (SSI 2015/19). The committee asked whether the title of the instrument should in fact be the “Firefighters Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025”. The Scottish Government agreed that that would be the more appropriate title. It regretted the departure from drafting convention but considered that the meaning, understanding or effect of the instrument would not be affected by the form of the title in this case.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, in respect of the fact that its title is not in line with drafting convention?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee also wish to note that the Scottish Government intends to correct a minor cross-referencing error identified by the committee as soon as possible, through a correction slip?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 4 is an evidence-taking session with Graham Simpson MSP, the member in charge of the Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill. He is accompanied by?Catriona Lyle, a solicitor from legal services at the Scottish Parliament. I welcome you both to the meeting and, indeed, welcome Mr Simpson back to the committee, even for just a short time, as he convened the committee in the last parliamentary session.
I remind you both that you do not have to press any buttons, as that will be done for you. We will move to questions.
It is quite rare to see an express power to legislatively sub-delegate in a bill. The committee is keenly interested in that, as it has the potential to erode democratic accountability. It is one thing to give Scottish ministers the power to make regulations, but it is another to give Scottish ministers the power to award that power to a third party.
With that in mind, it would be helpful if you could provide the committee with further context to that proposal in the bill. Is there a precedent that served as a model for section 21 of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
No problem.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
As there are no further questions, I thank Mr Simpson and Ms Lyle for their evidence this morning. The committee might follow-up in writing if additional questions stem from this morning’s session. Thank you once again.
That concludes the public part of the meeting.
10:29 Meeting continued in private until 11:06.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
I just want to echo the comments of the deputy convener, and note that bullet point 2 in paragraph 20 of the report says:
“Overall positivity about the Bank increased from 68 per cent to 83 per cent.”
Furthermore, paragraph 27 says that the bank
“demonstrates a culture of continuous improvement”;
paragraph 72 talks about its “sound oversight arrangements”; paragraph 89 mentions
“improvements in ... content and presentation”;
and there are other paragraphs in the report that say that the organisation appears to be doing well on governance.
I come back to a point made by my colleague Colin Beattie. I note that paragraphs 21 and 47 are about the issue of risk, and it strikes me that the organisation is very cautious, notwithstanding the financial straitjacket that it has to work within. It appears that it is focused on risk, that it is trying to provide certainty for business investment and that it is not prepared to go out on a limb. Is that an accurate assessment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is helpful. Obviously, that is a recommendation in the report, but has the point been put to SNIB in discussions between you and its representatives? If so, has it been receptive to it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
You have already touched on exhibit 4, on page 25, which outlines the process for the bank’s investment decisions. Those are taken without the Scottish Government’s involvement. How robust are the safeguards that are in place to maintain independence?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
In exhibit 7, on page 33, 27 local authority areas are covered, and five are not. Which are those five?